FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
![]() Ministers should set aside the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and deport foreign criminals, a Labour MP has said. Jonathan Brash, the MP for Hartlepool, said the Government should exercise its “perfectly legitimate” right to deport criminals by saying ECHR Article 8 rights to a family life do not apply in such cases. He is thought to be the first Labour MP to publicly declare that the Government should ignore the ECHR in order to return convicted foreign criminals back to their home countries. Many have used (exploited) Article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private and family life. A Pakistani paedophile, who was jailed for child sex offences but escaped removal from the UK as it would be “unduly harsh” on his children. Sri Lankan sex offender allowed to stay in Britain because he is gay Paedophile described as ‘danger to community’ argues deportation would breach his rights under ECHR https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...p-attack-echr/ |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
-
|
In principle I think countries should deal with their own criminals. I have some hesitance if deporting is effectively a death sentence, mostly because it'll become a slippery slope argument - i.e. if we'll deport knowing a death sentence is likely, why not just have our own death sentence.
Of course... Not here for any hypocrisy on this sort of policy. If we're going to deport criminals to their country of origin, then we have to accept British criminals detained abroad to be sent back to the UK. Which includes for example, Shamima Begum. But we already know how many TiBBers feel about that argument, from multiple threads. I can see there being plenty of "We don't want your criminals but we don't want you to send us ours!" with very little self-awareness of the entitlement involved in that. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
i think in the UK it's just a method for lawyers to make more money. There would be years of appeals for each case and the cost is all going in one direction
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Hands off my Brick!
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
In 2023 a Gambian man who raped a woman at knifepoint was allowed to
remain in the UK. He had arrived on a visitor visa in 2007 and spent the next 15 years dealing drugs in Edinburgh. Despite laws that state foreign nationals convicted in our courts should be deported, he successfully argued he should be allowed to stay on human rights grounds. A tribunal found that, if returned to his home country, he would ‘experience genuine difficulties being able to access a regular supply of his necessary medications’. He would also face a ‘real risk of social -isolation and stigmatisation’ given that he’s a rapist. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes
Labours Jonathan Brash MP. Joining what the Conservatives and Reform UK demand Last edited by arista; 25-03-2025 at 12:08 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
-
|
As you'll know Livia the money "generated" by cases involving the ECHR are an absolute pittance when compared to areas like corporate law, real eastate law, intellectual property law and litigation ... so no it's obviously not the truth. In fact it's a nonsensical claim. Because it's simply not where the money is. It is, in fact, a piss poor example of a revenue stream for the legal trade.
Being made out to be a pot of gold. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
-
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
A convicted Iranian sex offender has avoided deportation because drink and drug use have
made him distrust authority. Judges said the Iranian would be likely to behave in a “hostile” way if questioned by airport immigration officers in Tehran, because of his distrust of officialdom. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Should Britain pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights?
Yes 91% No 9% Total votes: 208,247 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
isn't the telegraph categorised as MSM?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
but the readers will have been indoctrinated by reading the fake MSM, which makes their responses trash. We also don't know the veracity of the poll results. Were all the responses an AI bot?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|