[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

The guy is getting stick because his intentions are poor.

If you create an event as a way to create further division, and not in good faith but out of spite and as a reaction, do not expect many corporations to step up and fund it. He isn't owed ****. More than that, funding any kind of social 'movement' is a marketing strategy and it's about return on investment - perhaps they understand an event like this won't really gain any traction because it isn't actually necessary. Every day people are celebrating heterosexuality. Nobody is being truly persecuted anywhere in the world for being straight and so who would sponsor an event that is effectively redundant and pointless. It's poor business. And on a purely superficial level, who would sponsor an event with a name Hetero Awesome Fest

However, I was actually talking about Women's History Month and the (fake) outrage levelled at lack of attention to it.

Or am I assuming those outraged at it receiving so little attention, while Pride receives lots, have worked tirelessly in campaigning to bring attention to it, obtain funding, create parades and fundraisers and have been blocked at every corner? (even though they didn't know it existed until pointed out to them on a Big Brother forum because they don't actually care and aren't actually bothered about Women's History Month they were just using it as a stick to beat pride with lmao). A very cliched and transparent tactic.

Just that top part...
If you create an event as a way to create further division, and not in good faith but out of spite and as a reaction, do not expect many corporations to step up and fund it.


You are making assumptions, which in turn creates division when you air it in public. Your head is to far up your own arse for you to realise that.


The 2nd part about women's MONTH.. it's basically for schools. Women's day is the celebration. The same celebration that people with their heads to far up their own arses as well use to widen any divide that already existed by heckling and abusing women celebraring their womanhood.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Beso

Just that top part...
You are making assumptions, which in turn creates division when you air it in public. Your head is to far up your own arse for you to realise that.

He has specifically stated himself he launched it to coincide with Pride month because he is against homosexuality. I'm not making assumptions.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

He has specifically stated himself he launched it to coincide with Pride month because he is against homosexuality. I'm not making assumptions.

Pride month is in september, and has been since the pandemic in his city/town..his event is in June.(prides official month)


His belief in god is the leading factor on his views on homosexuality..He said, it doesn't mean he doesn't love people, and explained you can love people without agreeing with what they chose to do in life.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Beso

Pride month is in september, and has been since the pandemic in his city/town..his event is in June.(prides official month)

His belief in god is the leading factor on his views on homosexuality..He said, it doesn't mean he doesn't love people, and explained you can love people without agreeing with what they chose to do in life.

The parade is in September, but Pride Month is June in the country he lives in. Last year he created Heterosexual Awesomeness Month, in June, in response to Pride Month.

The bar offered various specials throughout June, including free beers for "heterosexual men dressed like heterosexual men" on Mondays and discounts for heterosexual couples on Wednesdays.

The bar's owner, Mark Fitzpatrick, said he was inspired to create the event as a way to celebrate heterosexuality and "God's design for sexuality" in response to the Pride celebrations happening in his area.

The bar’s Facebook page also shared an image of a child vomiting rainbow with the caption “Protect the children,” invoking a decades-old false moral panic that LGBTQ people are dangerous to children — rhetoric increasingly weaponized by the right in recent years.

The bar wrote in response to the image, “This wouldn’t be posted if things hadn’t gone way too far!”

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...mon-rcna156063

If you think it wasn't in response to Pride month, and that it's done "with love" despite all of that information then I have news for you about whose head is up their own ass. And it ain't mine.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

The parade is in September, but Pride Month is June in the country he lives in. Last year he created Heterosexual Awesomeness Month, in June, in response to Pride Month.

The bar offered various specials throughout June, including free beers for "heterosexual men dressed like heterosexual men" on Mondays and discounts for heterosexual couples on Wednesdays.

The bar's owner, Mark Fitzpatrick, said he was inspired to create the event as a way to celebrate heterosexuality and "God's design for sexuality" in response to the Pride celebrations happening in his area.

The bar’s Facebook page also shared an image of a child vomiting rainbow with the caption “Protect the children,” invoking a decades-old false moral panic that LGBTQ people are dangerous to children — rhetoric increasingly weaponized by the right in recent years.

The bar wrote in response to the image, “This wouldn’t be posted if things hadn’t gone way too far!”

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...mon-rcna156063

If you think it wasn't in response to Pride month, and that it's done "with love" despite all of that information then I have news for you about whose head is up their own ass. And it ain't mine.

I dont think the information is totally correct for the reasons....the news outlet is saying he posted this, said that etc in response to the LGBTQ community, when If you look at what he was against it's more to do with the T of LGBTQ.

A letter that simply doesn't belong beside the rest, in my opinion, and perhaps this gentleman's as well.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Beso

I dont think the information is totally correct for the reasons....the news outlet is saying he posted this, said that etc in response to the LGBTQ community, when If you look at what he was against it's more to do with the T of LGBTQ.

A letter that simply doesn't belong beside the rest, in my opinion, and perhaps this gentleman's as well.

I'm just going by what he himself as said about homosexuality.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by BBXX

I'm just going by what he himself as said about homosexuality.

They used the vomiting child, which is a clear indication that this man leans more towards the uproar that trans activists have caused within the LGBTQ community trying to push laws that effect children, The rest of you should have booted them out for that.


But it seems the majority cut their noses of to spite their faces to support the beliefs of the group's minority. I suppose, on the plus side for me. It explains how the heads get so far up the arses.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by BBXX

The parade is in September, but Pride Month is June in the country he lives in. Last year he created Heterosexual Awesomeness Month, in June, in response to Pride Month.

The bar offered various specials throughout June, including free beers for "heterosexual men dressed like heterosexual men" on Mondays and discounts for heterosexual couples on Wednesdays.

The bar's owner, Mark Fitzpatrick, said he was inspired to create the event as a way to celebrate heterosexuality and "God's design for sexuality" in response to the Pride celebrations happening in his area.

The bar’s Facebook page also shared an image of a child vomiting rainbow with the caption “Protect the children,” invoking a decades-old false moral panic that LGBTQ people are dangerous to children — rhetoric increasingly weaponized by the right in recent years.

The bar wrote in response to the image, “This wouldn’t be posted if things hadn’t gone way too far!”

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...mon-rcna156063

If you think it wasn't in response to Pride month, and that it's done "with love" despite all of that information then I have news for you about whose head is up their own ass. And it ain't mine.

The Far Right always love to play that card.

But then I catch Melonie Mac (A Far Right YouTuber) for example calling Alice from Alice In Wonderland "pretty" in one of the Video Game iterations of the character.

And she's one of those moral panic types about the LGBT community.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

The Far Right always love to play that card.

Yes they do, particularly in the US. And of course, if they really cared about children they'd do something about the very preventable leading cause of deaths in kids in the U.S which is gun-related violence. But they don't actually care about children's safety, so they don't care about gun control - just control of women's bodies and gay people existing in society.

[Maru]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes they do, particularly in the US. And of course, if they really cared about children they'd do something about the very preventable leading cause of deaths in kids in the U.S which is gun-related violence. But they don't actually care about children's safety, so they don't care about gun control - just control of women's bodies and gay people existing in society.

Trust me when I say, the more people in the US experience this kind of outlandish view in the real world, they instinctively cling harder to their rights. This includes many liberal folk as well. We're not taught "protect gun rights at all costs"; We're taught to protect ALL rights at all costs. So yes, we know what we are actually hearing lol. It often comes from the same people who don't believe we can be left alone to follow good conscience and that curtailing Free Speech, Gun Rights and everything else is the easiest way to solve society's ills. Even though the West is declining on the whole culturally, so it's obviously not that simple, and it's one of the main reasons I like reading what people have to say here in SD about other parts of the world.

On just 1st Amendment alone, there is no right or left America. That doesn't exist. So it's odd to make protecting 2nd into being part of a one-sided political boogieman when it's considered a fundamental part of 1st. That's the reason for its order in the Constitution.

On the politicization of children, the media loves to focus on these arguments because it upsets political fringes. However, that's not fair to most people who still very comfortably can get along well and agree to hold key views in common. My experience has always been in a vast majority of cases that people do very much care about "the kids" and there isn't some enlightened monopoly that happens to "care more". No pun intended, but these are the arguments of a child.

My biggest hope is that my children enjoy the same rights I have another 200 years from now. We enjoy a prosperous life in the West by comparison to many nations (and especially history) and I think people lose sight of this. I am blessed every day I live where I do. So I am not going to give up a life and a philosophy I hold dear because of a few toasty memes or what trolls might write online on some media website out of boredom. It's amusing how many people think this is enough to make people switch. Obviously this isn't nearly sufficient or elections would be much easier to decide individually. But yeah, the above is non-negotiable for most Americans and the illusion that this is somehow a big one-sided political controversy here is very interesting to me...