Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo
You are quoting one rather disputed (to say the least ) study from the, ahem, University of Brighton
I will direct you to a popular comment regarding that "study " when the Telegraph reported on it:
"This is a study that is not worth the paper it's written on. Just look at the
numbers who participated. 19 transgender women, 20 cisgender women, 19
cisgender men and 11 transgender men. Such low numbers, even for an
experimental or preliminary study, is laughable and can hardly be taken
seriously. It also appears to be trying to push the narrative that being trans
(especially a man who identifies as a woman) is a disadvantage even though
results when it comes to sports involving speed, strength power and contact
have been irrefutably proven to show the opposite. This is a junk study to
satisfy the trans cult lobbyists trying to infiltrate womens sports and should
be thrown in the bin. The IOC should hang its head in shame for promoting
this garbage."
|
So my source is questionable because it's the University of Brighton but yours, the Telegraph, is fine? If you're suggesting mine is biased...erm, so is yours.
The truth of the matter is there are so few examples of research to use that we can only go off what we have and as I mentioned before, it's such a small infrequent issue that there will probably never be any widespread research because it's not the worth the time or money.