Quote:
Originally Posted by Quantum Boy
Often/most of the time is the part your keep willfully ignoring. Is your argument that this is always the case? Because... it simply isn't. A proportion retain a strength, reach, muscle mass and bone density advantage.
Again I'm genuinely asking if you have any realistic/reasonable way to "filter out" those retained advantages in a ranked setting where those with advantages will naturally rise upwards.
|
I'm not ignoring it, but do I see a 0.01% of a 0.02% of people as a massive issue? Not particularly. I appreciate my idea of a case-by-case basis is perfect, but I don't think your idea of banning trans women whose body composition falls in line with cis women is perfect either. This is a complex scenario and I don't have all the answers.
Threaded Mode