[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Excellent post Joey, good point of view and correct. This is why the thread title is WRONG.

He said it was probably homophobic…..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

He said it was probably homophobic…..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes so did I as you well know. He also said, read the bold part at the top, that nobody knows who did it. Unlike your claims. If you had anything about you then you'd change your title.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Excellent post Joey, good point of view and correct. This is why the thread title is WRONG. if the OP won't change it, the staff should.

Don't be ridiculous Kate, it's Glenns thread and he can call it what he wants, it's very likely that it was done for that reason

[Glenn.]

One of the mods who has posted in this thread has said it’s homophobic too.

I won’t be changing anything. No matter how you much you insist. As sad as that is.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Don't be ridiculous Kate, it's Glenns thread and he can call it what he wants, it's very likely that it was done for that reason

It is yes Niamh. It is likely. But it isn't a fact that homophobes did it. Therefore the title is wrong.

[Benjamin]

Pretty much everyone in the thread is assuming something tbf.

The only facts we know for certain is a rainbow bench was painted black by vandals.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

It was painted black by someone who mistook it for a pride bench.

Are you incapable of reading a thread before commenting? It’s literally what we’ve been discussing?

I have read the thread. You said a homophobe painted it because they thought it was a Pride thing. You suddenly know a lot about the perpetrator and the workings of their mind, even though you have no idea who it was. Maybe it was just a joyless old vandal.

[Glenn.]

Can Kate be banned from posting in here please. She hasn’t contributed anything to the thread except to bait.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

One of the mods who has posted in this thread has said it’s homophobic too.

I won’t be changing anything. No matter how you much you insist. As sad as that is.

No they said probably!!!

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Can Kate be banned from posting in here please. She hasn’t contributed anything to the thread except to bait.

Not arsed.

[Glenn.]

Go away then

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

Pretty much everyone in the thread is assuming something tbf.

The only facts we know for certain is a rainbow bench was painted black by vandals.

Don't you come in here being all reasonable. Where do you think you are?

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Livia

Don't you come in here being all reasonable. Where do you think you are?

Sorry, forgot myself for a moment

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Go away then

Bite me. You know you're wrong. You've presented it as a fact that it was a homophobe. Nobody else has, we've all said probably or possibly.

[Glenn.]

Anyway

[Crimson Dynamo]

Maybe it was Banksy

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

Maybe it was Banksy

Bahaha

[Glenn.]

Funny how some people think dismissing homophobia makes them look all edgy and contrarian. Wow, so rebellious—rolling your eyes at basic decency and acting like caring about hate is just “virtue signalling.”

Spoiler: it doesn’t make you deep or clever. It just makes you look like you’re desperate to feel superior to people who still have empathy.

[Jordan.]

The struggle deciding if you want to downplay homophobia or blame it on Muslim immigrants

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

The struggle deciding if you want to downplay homophobia or blame it on Muslim immigrants

Who is down playing it? Certainly not me. I clearly say it most likely was several times in here.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Who is down playing it? Certainly not me. I clearly say it most likely was several times in here.

You’ve spent most of this thread splitting hairs over whether it was definitely or probably homophobic, as if that technicality somehow matters more than the fact someone still targeted it out of bigotry. It’s just a way to minimise it without having to admit you’re minimising it.

[arista]

At least the Metal bench
can still be used

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

You’ve spent most of this thread splitting hairs over whether it was definitely or probably homophobic, as if that technicality somehow matters more than the fact someone still targeted it out of bigotry. It’s just a way to minimise it without having to admit you’re minimising it.

Rubbish. And you're still wrong btw. It is not a fact that someone targeted it out of bigotry. No matter how much you hammer the point.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Oh I see, you know exactly what was in this morons mind then? Silly me. I'm not saying it's not highly likely, I do agree with it being very probable but not so daft as to announce it as fact like you have.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Still isn't a fact.

Originally Posted by Kate!

I didn't say otherwise. I said it was highly probable but not a fact.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Sigh, yes I said that several times. Stop going on. No matter what we think it is only probably the case. Not fact. Why so hell bent on saying it is.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Excellent post Joey, good point of view and correct. This is why the thread title is WRONG. if the OP won't change it, the staff should.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Yes so did I as you well know. He also said, read the bold part at the top, that nobody knows who did it. Unlike your claims. If you had anything about you then you'd change your title.

Originally Posted by Kate!

It is yes Niamh. It is likely. But it isn't a fact that homophobes did it. Therefore the title is wrong.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Bite me. You know you're wrong. You've presented it as a fact that it was a homophobe. Nobody else has, we've all said probably or possibly.

Originally Posted by Kate!

Rubbish. And you're still wrong btw. It is not a fact that someone targeted it out of bigotry. No matter how much you hammer the point.

You have to laugh

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

You have to laugh

For every one of those, there's a post from you adamantly insisting that it was definitely homophobic. Show me a link that says this is the considered viewpoint.