Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-01-2026, 11:20 AM #11
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,418


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,418


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maru View Post
The Danish may be nice enough to us, but that doesn't go very far in the environment we are in now where hostile powers are growing and not much had been done about it. They're not going to be on the hook for defense if Russia crosses a line.

We are where we are partially because we've had all these smaller countries with no real military power politically veto many of the solutions to problems because they prefer to live in an ideal world and now have an ideology tethered to it. Our enemies have taken advantage of this. Ex: It's reasonable and normal to place checks & balances on the transfer of people and property across the border because it is a national security threat.

There's a psychological side effect also, is that it's putting our enemies firmly on notice and putting a pin in the map. It's also telling allies to stop interfering with whatever idealistic neurosis they come up with next and start actually treating our enemies like a real threat. Tackling Venezuela puts countries like Cuba and Mexico on notice, which is sensible as they're both narco-states and any sense of diplomacy will simply be ignored by them. Just mentioning possibly acquiring Greenland is a simple enough signal to Russia that we do take the threat seriously, so that may be enough to deescalate, at least somewhat.

Whatever I think of more American interference (much bigger topic), there's at least a reasoning behind it. The alternative is we close up our borders entirely and then leave the world to rest of it. That's a possibility that is always being weighed, I think.
Trump's actions and his threats are alienating allies and putting the future of NATO at risk. The US clearly thinks that's acceptable collateral damage, which is worrying. If the US really is worried enough about Russia to enter the sovereign territory of another allied country and take it by force, you'd think Trump would have been stronger against Putin in Ukraine. But his interaction with Putin bordered on appeasement. Now he's threatening to do exactly what Putin did when he crossed the border of another country. That's what it looks like to me.
Livia is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
adamant, debate, future, greenland, hold, trump


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts