[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Where are there ANY females or kids more like


Every photo we see on a daily/weekly basis shows boat fulls of young , healthy , strong looking young men …

Yes, about 15% were women and 15% were children.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes, I thought so. All this division because of 50p a week.

What a sad world we live in.

You can feel happy that your paying for a 6 month sabbatical for thousands of foreigners...just shows you up for the doormat you are.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes, about 15% were women and 15% were children.

That was a long long time ago...

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Parmy

You can feel happy that your paying for a 6 month sabbatical for thousands of foreigners...just shows you up for the doormat you are.

Hey, I helped pay for people like your friend as well! I really have no bother in paying for people who need assistance. If that means you think I am a doormat, so be it, your opinion of me means nothing.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

This is a policy issue, they cannot work when they arrive. If this was changed, they would work and they would contribute tax.

Many have worked and kept what they earned...cause they are only here for what they can get.....and how do you know they would work? That's the same as me lumping them alll as criminals, which you said I was when I wasn't..



I would imagine the stats say that most that are available to work now, just simply don't, and prefer the benefit money when the wives and 10 kids come over.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Parmy

That was a long long time ago...

No.

2022:
All males (all ages) ~77–79%
All females (all ages) ~21–23%

2023:
All males (all ages) ~78–80%
All females (all ages) ~20–22%

2024:
All males (all ages) ~76–78%
All females (all ages) ~22–24%

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Parmy

You can feel happy that you’re paying for a 6 month sabbatical for thousands of foreigners...just shows you up for the doormat you are.

We pay for 1.68m of our own unemployed. And far many more tax dodgers. Selective outrage

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Parmy

Many have worked and kept what they earned...cause they are only here for what they can get.....and how do you know they would work? That's the same as me lumping them alll as criminals, which you said I was when I wasn't..

I would imagine the stats say that most that are available to work now, just simply don't, and prefer the benefit money when the wives and 10 kids come over.

Nice.

50% of them go to work within a couple of years they're able to. This is lower than the approx 75% of working-age UK citizens being employed in the same period, however it should also be considered the significant barriers they will face when looking for jobs - large gaps on their CV, potential language barriers, they are limited to what jobs they can apply for and of course employer discrimination. And that obviously doesn't mean those unemployed aren't applying.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Yes, about 15% were women and 15% were children.

Well I have never seen any ..

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Well I have never seen any ..

Oh right.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Well I have never seen any ..

It’s a good job for the stats then huh

[Zizu]

Why do we only see photos like these on the BBC and Sky ?

[Glenn.]

Why indeed

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

It’s a good job for the stats then huh

Anyone can pluck stats that suit their cause from the internet .. you must know that

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Anyone can pluck stats that suit their cause from the internet .. you must know that

You know what dude. Cool. Sure.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Where are there ANY females or kids more like


Every photo we see on a daily/weekly basis shows boat fulls of young , healthy , strong looking young men …

Not everything you see on the news is conclusive. Even you should be able to know that.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Well I have never seen any ..

I guess they don’t exist, then. If Zizu’s eyes haven’t caught glaze (for-once), they mustn’t exist. Okay. Got it.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Why do we only see photos like these on the BBC and Sky ?

You are so close to getting it. Why do you think?

Anyone can pluck stats that suit their cause from the internet .. you must know that

The stats are from recorded Home Office data.

Anyone can pluck three photos from the internet to suit their cause, you must know that.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by BBXX

You are so close to getting it. Why do you think?



The stats are from recorded Home Office data.

Anyone can pluck three photos from the internet to suit their cause, you must know that.

Because photos don't lie, we all know the boats moor up out in the water, sometimes too deep for women and children to access and more often than not its survival of the fittest and who gets to the dinghy first, there is no chivalry or women and children first attitude but you know that

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Redway

I guess they don’t exist, then. If Zizu’s eyes haven’t caught glaze (for-once), they mustn’t exist. Okay. Got it.

Can you provide any evidence of boats packed with women and children?

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Because photos don't lie, we all know the boats moor up out in the water, sometimes too deep for women and children to access and more often than not its survival of the fittest and who gets to the dinghy first, there is no chivalry or women and children first attitude but you know that

I've outlined the HO data. If you choose to believe otherwise based on carefully selected photos I'm not sure what to tell you. Maybe we can call that Cherie Picking.

Just because we see what we see it doesn't mean what we don't see doesn't exist.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Can you provide any evidence of boats packed with women and children?

Nobody has said they're packed with women and children. Women and children make up approx 25-30% of crossings. Nobody has pretended otherwise.

Why are you resorting to hyperbole and asking for something nobody has claimed exists.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

We pay for 1.68m of our own unemployed. And far many more tax dodgers. Selective outrage

That's answered simply....

We also have our own criminals, so why on earth would we guarantee that the number increases instead of decreases. That is a government doing nothing but increase its populations chances of being attacked or robbed when it should be doing everything to bring thise stats down.

Heaping more and more on benefits makes no financial sense. So why in earth should the already heavily burdened working population be forced to shell out more or see underfunded facilities like the nhs have to wave bye bye to those much needed funds as it gently floats into those grasping foreign hands.


It's crazy to guarantee this happens by facilitating this boat nonsense.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

No.

2022:
All males (all ages) ~77–79%
All females (all ages) ~21–23%

2023:
All males (all ages) ~78–80%
All females (all ages) ~20–22%

2024:
All males (all ages) ~76–78%
All females (all ages) ~22–24%

Is that the boat figures or people seeking asylum.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Nice.

50% of them go to work within a couple of years they're able to. This is lower than the approx 75% of working-age UK citizens being employed in the same period, however it should also be considered the significant barriers they will face when looking for jobs - large gaps on their CV, potential language barriers, they are limited to what jobs they can apply for and of course employer discrimination. And that obviously doesn't mean those unemployed aren't applying.

Limited to jobs they can apply for.


Doctors
Teachers
Proffesor.


Sometimes you just have to down grade like the rest of us and get a shovel in your hand.