[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

Past? 1998, 2003, and again in 2008!

Yes past means time that has elapsed. 1998 and 2003 have elapsed. And in 2008 he did nothing wrong.

[informer]

Originally Posted by BlackOrWhite

Yes past means time that has elapsed. 1998 and 2003 have elapsed. And in 2008 he did nothing wrong.

Would you be happy to see a rapist in the house on the basis that it was 'in the past'

[hennessy]

Originally Posted by informer

Would you be happy to see a rapist in the house on the basis that it was 'in the past'

Well Sisqo is guilty of statutory rape

[informer]

Originally Posted by hennessy

Well Sisqo is guilty of statutory rape

rape is forced, i think the girl was underage..that isnt rape if she consented..

im not happy with sisqo but its possible that he thought she was older?

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by informer

rape is forced, i think the girl was underage..that isnt rape if she consented..

I do defend Sisqo on this but rape and statutory rape are different.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by informer

rape is forced, i think the girl was underage..that isnt rape if she consented..

im not happy with sisqo but its possible that he thought she was older?

Dont show your ignorance Paul.

[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by BlackOrWhite

Yes past means time that has elapsed. 1998 and 2003 have elapsed. And in 2008 he did nothing wrong.

3 strikes and you're out! You are aware that his past would be raised should he be convicted again, and reflected in a harsher sentence?

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

3 strikes and you're out! You are aware that his past would be raised should he be convicted again, and reflected in a harsher sentence?

Yes, I am aware of that. I don't see what it has to do with anything.

[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by BlackOrWhite

Yes, I am aware of that. I don't see what it has to do with anything.

He has 2 convictions for violent assault, plus been in a brutal bar brawl and bit the nose of a Mirror journalist. That's at least 4 violent incidents tht we know of.

I reject your notion of the past, it's a license for everyone in the world to be violent and excuse themselves of their actions because some time has elapsed.

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

He has 2 convictions for violent assault, plus been in a brutal bar brawl and bit the nose of a Mirror journalist. That's at least 4 violent incidents tht we know of.

I reject your notion of the past, it's a license for everyone in the world to be violent and excuse themselves of their actions because some time has elapsed.

I couldn't care if you 'reject my notion' The fact is we're not talking aboiut how the legal system works.

And Mirror journalists need more than bite on the f-ing nose!

[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by BlackOrWhite

I couldn't care if you 'reject my notion' The fact is we're not talking aboiut how the legal system works.
And Mirror journalists need more than bite on the f-ing nose!

You said it didn't matter, that's an opinion. In law it does matter, that's a fact.

[BlackOrWhite]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

You said it didn't matter, that's an opinion. In law it does matter, that's a fact.

When did I say his previous convictions wouldn't matter in a court of law? I didn't, don't put words in my mouth. What I did say was that we're not talking about law here.

[informer]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

He has 2 convictions for violent assault, plus been in a brutal bar brawl and bit the nose of a Mirror journalist. That's at least 4 violent incidents tht we know of.

I reject your notion of the past, it's a license for everyone in the world to be violent and excuse themselves of their actions because some time has elapsed.

Sends a chill down the spine of any decent human being hearing those incidents of violence