[Stu]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

You still don't get it, do you? She is not saying what he did was right. Or legal. So from that stance then yes, you are taking a moral highground. Any debate that involves you calling people who disagree with you paedophiles is taking a moral highground.

You are brilliant at this whole putting words in peoples mouths business.

[alchemists1]

Dude you protest to much and seem to have an unhealthy interest in 14 year old girls.
How many threads is that you've now made on the subject?
Give it a rest and take your perverted mindset somewhere else.

[InOne]

So Sisqo shagged some 14 year old broad, it really does not affect my life in any way and I don't pretend to take a moral high group. None of you would give a fuck if they both died tomorrow

[Ghostinthehouse]

RLMAO.

What? You can't be serious?

[Jessica.]

He was 20 he didn't know she was 14!

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

RLMAO.

What? You can't be serious?

Seems to me that this is going round n round in circles because of your stubborn inability to learn the meaning of certain words.

Change your wording and your arguement may make more sense.

Yes, he was wrong to bed a 14 year old. But does that mean he has a general sexual interest in young children? Not necessarily.

Especially if she DID NOT LOOK LIKE A CHILD AT THE TIME.

Now look, you've forced me to use capitals.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Judas Iscariot

Again, there is a big difference between being a young, drunk twat and making a mistake with a fourteen year old dressed up as an eighteen year old ... and being a full blown paedophile. The latter of which have a consistent, definate attraction to young childen.

Judas Judas....you never learn....

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Jessica..

He was 20 he didn't know she was 14!

How do you know that? Did Sisqo said that?

[SocietyIsRuined]

I voted yes on the basis that I would say the same about Roman Polanski. But it is a bit harsh to call him it.

[1000Usernames]

He should not better than to do anything with 14 year old girls but paedo is a harse one and he has never reoffended. Paedo's are always a paedo.

[Jayson]

It's wrong.

She was dressed up to look like she was at least 18.

Plus, she was in an 18+ club, so Sisqo assumed that she was 18 solely based on the fact that she was inside the club.

Even if he had asked her how old she was, she would've most likely told a lie, so tbh Sisqo could never have known.

[Shasown]

In the UK paedophile generally means offending with pre pubescent, In the US any sex offence with a minor would get the paedophile label.(this includes sex with an underage person - statutory rape, as a minor is deemed not to be able to give consent)

As Sisqo is a US citizen. and they know best, we often follow their lead, you know wars, obesity, etc I think its only fair we follow their lead on this as well.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

How do you know that? Did Sisqo said that?

That works both ways my friend. Think before you post.

[Firewire]

Wrong.

[Stu]

LOL @ this poll. No doubt sense has prevailed. And no doubt there is something wrong with all of us.

[CaudleHalbard]

Why does anyone still care?

Sisqo has gone and will sink back into obscurity - along with his Thong Song!

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

I am afraid it is thee that does not see........None so blind as those that do not want to see or those that are high on a morality goody goody tirade........

As other have pointed out it is so so simple..If he definitely thought she was an adult. Mother nature can do this you know along with make up. He was foolish to be fooled maybe but he is only a paedo if he knew her age and if he was attracted to her age........

A man attracted to who looks and behaves like an adult is not a paedo.

[30stone]

Damn, i just clicked on the wrong thread..

and answered without realising my bad.