[Scarlett.]

because bashing a pupil over the head with a blunt object is a suitable way of punishing a pupil

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Chewy

because bashing a pupil over the head with a blunt object is a suitable way of punishing a pupil

This, Kids are demonised too much these days it's shocking. Send the *****er down.

[cupid stunt]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

This, Kids are demonised too much these days it's shocking. Send the *****er down.

that little **** shouldnt have bullied tht teacher 4 months when he knew the poor bloke were mental, well HES BEEN SET FREE NA SO STICK DAT IN YA PIPE N SMOKE IT

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

that little **** shouldnt have bullied tht teacher 4 months when he knew the poor bloke were mental, well HES BEEN SET FREE NA SO STICK DAT IN YA PIPE N SMOKE IT

Still, if this man couldn't handle it then he shouldn't have been in the classroom. Kids are cruel, doesn't give people the rights to smash their heads in though.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Still, if this man couldn't handle it then he shouldn't have been in the classroom. Kids are cruel, doesn't give people the rights to smash their heads in though.

Like I said earlier, the school is to blame - probably compelled the poor man to return to work because he'd been deemed fit to do so by his therapist apparently! If he hadn't gone back, he would probably have got a disciplinary or lost wages. He was probably unaware himself that he was not fit - that's a determination that should have been made by his therapist, doctor and school.

The kids were screwed because of the video that showed what actually happened from beginning to end, so they couldn't lie their way out of it by saying "we didn't do nuffin". That's why he was acquitted, the jury saw for themselves what he had to endure before he finally snapped.
Remember it wasn't just this one occasion, these kids had been baiting him for months. Perhaps they'll think twice before they try it with anyone else.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by angus58

Like I said earlier, the school is to blame - probably compelled the poor man to return to work because he'd been deemed fit to do so by his therapist apparently! If he hadn't gone back, he would probably have got a disciplinary or lost wages. He was probably unaware himself that he was not fit - that's a determination that should have been made by his therapist, doctor and school.

The kids were screwed because of the video that showed what actually happened from beginning to end, so they couldn't lie their way out of it by saying "we didn't do nuffin". That's why he was acquitted, the jury saw for themselves what he had to endure before he finally snapped.
Remember it wasn't just this one occasion, these kids had been baiting him for months. Perhaps they'll think twice before they try it with anyone else.

True about the school but if I'm honest I can't drum up much sympathy for someone who would do that to a kid. He should have been sent down for it really. He obviously committed GBH with intent so he should have gone down for perhaps a smaller amount of time then usual given the cirumstances.

He did crack so they should have had him do the sentance in a mental health facility so that he doesn't brain anyone else in future.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

True about the school but if I'm honest I can't drum up much sympathy for someone who would do that to a kid. He should have been sent down for it really. He obviously committed GBH with intent so he should have gone down for perhaps a smaller amount of time then usual given the cirumstances.

He did crack so they should have had him do the sentance in a mental health facility so that he doesn't brain anyone else in future.

I'm fed up with the argument that they were just kids. Yeah, kids who knew exactly what they were doing and which buttons to push, the cruel b*stards. They wanted a reaction, but unfortunately for them they got more than they bargained for. He was acquitted because it was done in the heat of the moment (not premeditated) when he was under intense emotional and psychological pressure so the jury made the correct decision. He probably entered a plea of temporary insanity, and you cannot indict somebody who is insane.