| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB11 Channel 4's last Big Brother series started June 2010. Josie Gibson was the winner. All the gossip about the Big Brother 11 house, series and housemates here! |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
Anyone else think this? It seems like BB8's female centric house all over again. Whilst it's been a good series thus far, I'm finding it hard to get into or care about as much as I did BB10.
Marcus, Siavash, Freddie, Rex, Darnell, and more were all very dominant male characters from the last two years and were, in some peoples opinions obviously, 'cool' guys you could get behind. John James is cool, but he is about as interesting as an out of service elavator. Govan is not actually a male homo sapien. There's just this strange 'missing thing' about the series I can't put my finger on. It's like too many housemates are from the same spectrum and should only be half the actual cast. And the house ... I no longer like. It looks great in pictures but on camera it looks so ... un BB like. In terms of live feed viewing I actually rathered the BB10 house. Yeah. Glad that's off my chest. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Nothing in excess
|
I'm not sure I agree. I would say Nathan, Steve and John were all reasonably tough and assertive..
And I wouldn't call Siavash, Freddie and Marcus strong male characters. They were very easily led on by vixens like Noirin and Bea. Although, Marcus slightly made up for it in having the measure of Bea, not to mention Siavash, later on. Siavash, it goes without saying, is one of the emotionally weakest male housemates in recent memory. You are quite right about BB8 though. That series was a testosterone vacuum.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Most powerful man on TiBB
|
Govan is a strong male
Last edited by President; 14-06-2010 at 06:07 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
@BBEye.
Bear in mind I'm using the term 'strong male characters' in the screen prescence sense, not the sociological sense. I should have been clearer, sorry. Freddie, Siavash and Marcus were three distinct, colourful characters who were omnipresent on the highlight shows. In comparison, John James, Steve and Nathan are absoloute bores. John James is too nice a naive tourist, Steve has already melted into the sofa and will in all likelyhood stay there for the next three months, and Nathan is like Bez without the amphetamines.
Last edited by Stu; 14-06-2010 at 06:10 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Bring in Marcus with his Spoon of Death!
__________________
Dere's more to Oireland dan dis. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
V.I.P
|
I have never ever agreed with a post as much as I do here.
Well said Stu.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
User tanned
|
Quote:
But yeah Ive said myself that this house needs an alphamale. JJ is like a big dopey dog. Ben has a stick up his ass and is far too self conscious. The others...meh. A masculine, dominant male good looker would be great to throw in the mix very soon. Would unsettle all the guys and get the females fighting for his attention. Not another Tom though. He was too reserved and above it all...or so he thought. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Every-single-year the women get slaughtered for anything and everything; if they're quiet then they're boring/antisocial, if they're lively then they're too loud/attention grabbing/show-off, if they try to do thing around the house, they're controlling, if they don't then they're lazy/selfish, if they get angry they're bad tempered,if they get upset they're cry-babies, if they have a brain and have the qualifications to prove it then they're devious and have a game plan, if they voluteer information about themselves then they're seen as vain, if they as lots of questions about people then they're seen as nosey. We don't need men to make this show worth watching. I think what makes the show worth watching is the personalities off -all- the housemates and how they interact with each in a calm,sane way, how they handle the challenges and their ability to be creative and interesting in -that- kind of minimalist environment. Afteral, this is supposed to be a "socail experiment" not a platform for some bloke to lose his temper,threaten, verbally abuse, or patronise people he's never met before, just beacuse they "piss him off" or aren't as smart/settled/acomplished as he is. |
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
You missed my point entirely and veered off in the direction of paranoid neo femenist rant, but whatever. I was missing WOMBAI anyway.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
Nothing in excess
|
Quote:
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
The title of the thread must have thrown Me, I thought you were trying to say that the men in the house were the most important element to the show.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
V.I.P
|
I keep feeling like there is more to come in this series, almost as if it hasn't started yet I hope more twists come soon that bring in more new HMs.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
Quote:
I kid. An all male house would suck almost as much as an all female house. Which once upon a time sucked really, really hard. Pun absoloutely intended.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
I think Steve and Nathan could turn out to be like this. Give 'em a chance though it hasn't even been a week.
__________________
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And btw, I'm not female. |
||
|
|
|
|
#22 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
john james is all the man we need
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Anyway, I'm not saying strong male=bully, no, I'm saying that I really think that a lot of the men in the house have displayed a kind of strength that I personally find really offencive; more james bond type masculinity that say, Cary Grant figure. Both strong types of men, but both very different. |
||
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
||||
|
OAP Member
|
I think Kate Lawlor was a strong female character. She had great craic in the house and tried to stay away from the bitching and fighting (even tho Jade pushed her to the limit!). She really enjoyed BB for what is was.
Strong Male characters, BB1 Craig (tho he slept for most of the series!) BB2 the men were not strong characters at all. BB3 Spencer was a strong male character but booted too soon. BB4 Jon cause he did his own thing regardless of what anyone else thought. BB5 The men were worse bitches than the girls, and that is saying something. BB6 maybe Derek? BB7 the men were a bit rubbish too. BB8 I refused to watch..because of belo and Charley. BB9 was Rex until his girlfriend came in and he completely changed. BB10 Marcus and Tom could have had potiental but then Noireen waved her magic wand and something happened. Still loved Marcus tho!
__________________
They say you are a man of good... taste. Dracula Last edited by bansheewails; 14-06-2010 at 07:22 PM. Reason: make it a bit easier to read |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|