[MrGaryy]

Originally Posted by Claymores

People on BB fansites have got it wrong anyway - it's an unpopularity contest.

HMs set up their horrors through nominations then the public drop-kick their most despised one.

It's a feel-good factor to get rid of a horror of a Friday for the public rather than allow them to be on the tellybox for the 'drama' (as FMs oftten bemoan)

It's the nature of the game - FMs who want fundamental changes to eviction format need to watch a different show instead if they dislike the 11 series rules of the game.

Just my opinion

I completely agree. I find this widespread belief across the board that the public should reward nastiness and ugliness and keep these people in 'for the sake of the show' extremely tedious. They don't seem to realise that it's the recent crops of nasty, unpleasant people being cast that is one of the show's biggest pitfalls and has ultimately made the show miserable and really unappealing to the public, hence it;s demise. Only the hardcore stans on the forums actually enjoy people like Govan for example, the majority of viewers and voters don;t enjoy watching irritating, nasty people.

And if I see one more thread about 'ur all gunna vote out da gud ones like govan and rachael and b left wit ores like dave being holy!!!' some bitch is actually going to get cut, I promise you.