Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB11 Channel 4's last Big Brother series started June 2010. Josie Gibson was the winner. All the gossip about the Big Brother 11 house, series and housemates here!

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-07-2010, 10:58 AM #1
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showstopper View Post
Lets be honest here they are quite simply boring (and in Mario's case three sheets to the wind).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_%28sailing%29

Quote:
The term "three sheets to the wind," meaning "staggering drunk," refers to a ship whose sheets have come loose, causing the sails to flap uncontrolled and the ship to meander at the mercy of the elements. Also, "Three sheets in the wind, unsteady from drink."
Surely not ?

Unless he has a secret stash of alcohol ?


Last edited by Omah; 28-07-2010 at 11:00 AM.
Omah is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:01 AM #2
Showstopper's Avatar
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_%28sailing%29



Surely not ?

Unless he has a secret stash of alcohol ?

ok allow me to rephrase then - completely mental
Showstopper is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:26 AM #3
Shiner's Avatar
Shiner Shiner is offline
My version of reality..TV
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,061
Shiner Shiner is offline
My version of reality..TV
Shiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,061
Default

Dave's infraction (this time) was so borderline it was unbelievable - he didn't actually mention nominations, he actually mentioned non-nomination of 2 individuals. This could conceivably only be seen as influential if there were only a few people in the house left to nominate. JJJ told JJ they wouldn't nominate him which is far more influential than what Dave did.
What JJJ are doing with their mics is rule breaking 101. What do they have to hide? Switching off or incapacitating their mics means they are not participating in the show. They have already been punished for it - remember they had to draw cocks on each other in the DR - a savage punishment if ever I saw one. If they still do not wish to be part of the program then show them the door and give us back our fecking show.
__________________
Shiner is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:35 AM #4
Showstopper's Avatar
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiner View Post
Dave's infraction (this time) was so borderline it was unbelievable

What JJJ are doing with their mics is rule breaking 101. .
In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead
Showstopper is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:38 AM #5
WOMBAI WOMBAI is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,957


WOMBAI WOMBAI is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,957


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showstopper View Post
In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead
How do you know what they were discussing - that is the whole point - they took their mics off and could have been talking about anything - including nominations! They would hardly admit to that though - would they! Naive comment!
WOMBAI is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:43 AM #6
Showstopper's Avatar
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Showstopper Showstopper is offline
I'm getting angry
Showstopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 924

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WOMBAI View Post
How do you know what they were discussing - that is the whole point - they took their mics off and could have been talking about anything - including nominations! They would hardly admit to that though - would they! Naive comment!
If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing
Showstopper is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:54 AM #7
Tessier Ashpool's Avatar
Tessier Ashpool Tessier Ashpool is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: La La Land
Posts: 60

Favourites:
BB11: Shabby
CBB7: Sov
Tessier Ashpool Tessier Ashpool is offline
Member
Tessier Ashpool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: La La Land
Posts: 60

Favourites:
BB11: Shabby
CBB7: Sov
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showstopper View Post
If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing
But ,also in the real world, HMs have been punished for mentioning nominations when it has been obvious that they were not trying to influence votes. BB changes the rules at their whim.

Dave get put up for discussing nominations, where other HMs have got away with it more than once - because BB doen't favour Dave.

JJ gets to turn off his microphone, break-out into the camera runs and it goes unpunished - because BB favours him. Simples. May aswell hand him the crown now
Tessier Ashpool is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 12:04 PM #8
WOMBAI WOMBAI is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,957


WOMBAI WOMBAI is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,957


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showstopper View Post
If they're smart enough to break off an emotional conversation to discuss nominations then I say Bravo, they should get away with it. But coming back to the real world its abundently clear what they were discussing


Alternatively - it could just be part of the act! And that is besides the point - they have no right to break the rules and should be punished accordingly! They could of been discussing anything - regardless of their 'apparent' emotional state - no exceptions for anyone!
WOMBAI is offline  
Old 28-07-2010, 11:49 AM #9
Shiner's Avatar
Shiner Shiner is offline
My version of reality..TV
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,061
Shiner Shiner is offline
My version of reality..TV
Shiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showstopper View Post
In terms of Dave he clearly broke the rules, stupidity is not an excuse


In terms of JJJ, they were discussing their own relationship, not nominations. Also BB is not going to punish the stars of their show. They should maybe punish Mario instead
My point was about disparity. You obviously agree.
Although from your standpoint it is justified because you like JJJ which proves my point further and discredits yours to the n'th degree.
__________________

Last edited by Shiner; 28-07-2010 at 11:50 AM.
Shiner is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
breaks, rule, unpunished


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts