Quote:
Originally Posted by WOMBAI
All well and good - but his brief mention of inconsistency in punishments seems weak to say the least! I don't see how they can miss anything - and the punishment dished out to JJ and Josie for the repeated removal of microphones (and probably noms talk) was not of the same severity as the punishments dished out to Dave for no worse! Total inconsistency - they are supposed to be professionals at what they do - we certainly haven't seen much of that!
And all the airtime given to the 'showmance' - blatant unfairness! Bound to benefit those involved.
They have to defend themselves, whether there be any truth in said allegations or not! He isn't really likely to say anthing else is he!
|
I agree with you. Of course they can write a piece that accuses forum uses as being fat thin evil etc but the fact remains: John James and Josie have had more air time than any other housemate. Until very recently it was the only camera shot that we had in the a.m. Hours of voyerism by the camera person: Will they won't they? John James said he never would so why have the camera on them when other housemates were up and about?
Too many people feel that BB11 has been made around those two to the detriment of the other housemates.
I want to know why JJ1 has not been punished for him telling Josie that she is number one favourite.