Quote:
Originally Posted by Omen
That's pretty much the substance of this hypothesis. I don't say I believe it, just trying to flesh out the bones of it and see where we are.
|
Ah so we are playing a game of lets pretend in that we ignore the reality and practicalities of such a plan and just pretend its possible.
Okay then to preplant the explosives could be done, what couldnt be guaranteed is what the impact of the aircraft would do. Even empty aircraft fuel tanks contain highly flammable fuel vapours which may cause a fire, destroying part or all of the explosives.
Too many things could go wrong within your plan. Would a businessman make such plans on the assumption that the events that did occur would have occurred.
It would only take one part of the plan to go wrong and the whole conspiracy is laid bare to the world.
Even then would someone knowingly blow the buildings when they were still full of people? Thats mass murder.
Why place explosives when the risk of discovery is high, even if the buildings didnt collapse he still picks up the insurance payoff, because of the dangerous state they were in. They would have been deemed to be unusable, unsafe till they were demolished and rebuilt.