Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
Where did I say that? I've never said it's not a good idea, though I believe there are/were rules in place that the public didn't know about, and to be quite honest, didn't need to know about. They're just precautionary measures. You can't expect Dermot to read the full T&C's of the Judges vote every single Sunday just to please a few obsessive complainers that are desperately trying to look for ways to moan becuase Katie didn't go/hasn't gone yet. At the end of the day, my point was - none of this moaning /suggestions to make it 'clear' would've occured [like in Series 4, when no moaning occured] if Katie had gone/was another two acts in the Bottom Two.
|
I didn't say you did, it was a question, hence the question mark at the end of the sentence. No I don't expect Dermot to read out all the terms and conditions but since this has caused some annoyance with the viewers(essentially the people who pay his wages) then I don't see what harm making it clear about what would happen in the future if the same scenario occurred, would do, do you?
Threaded Mode