[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Blitzen

What else are you gonna test the perfume on though? A banana?

Imagine if Calvin Klein released a brand new fragrance without animal testing. They miss out a side effect and so when its released the perfume causes skin diseases in people. Surely a couple of mice is worth more than disfiguring potentially thousands of people?

Yes, but we dont NEED perfume.

I get mm&is point.

I dont agree with it for cosmetic stuff. If the people making the perfume/whatever who are going to profit from it want to test it, test it on themselves. Why put an animal through potential pain?

I do think sometimes animal testing can sometimes be necessary though, to test out medication and things like that.