Quote:
Originally Posted by marney
|
The article doesn't state that the police weren't given this info weeks ago - they could have had it for some time and that info is only now being released. Because the word 'new footage' is included in the article, doesn't mean it is new to the police - only 'new' in relation to the public being unaware of it.
Or.....
the 71 year old could have been away on holiday for a few weeks during the whole saga and has recently returned, hence late availability of this footage.
or......
they actually don't have anything and are playing "panic the killer into thinking they have something on them" ?
It's anyone's guess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InOne
Link doesn't work for me :S
|
Presume it's this :
http://www.people.co.uk/news/uk-worl...2039-22852165/
One thing that interests me is the saliva found on Joanna. The DNA from this saliva, that they need to try to match up as they think it belongs to the killer...... I'll take a guess then that it hasn't matched up to CJ's DNA then, otherwise they'd have hauled him back in PDQ.
16-01-2011, 12:01 PM
Threaded Mode