Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
I'm not entirely sure [and I should be...I do Business Studies], but I believe there are discrimination acts which prevent businesses from not employing staff/refusing to serve customers on the basis of their race, gender or sexual orientation, amongst other things. In which case they are indeed breaking the law. There's no 'oh it's their home they can do what they want' about it. It's a business. They have to adhere to rules.
|
Yeah but the question was whether the policy targetted gay people specifically or all married couples as was the official line. The judge ruled that seeing as they still didnt allow those who are gay and in a civil partnership that the policy did discriminate on the basis of sexuality.
I think if it was a gay couple who were not in a civil partnership then they would not have been prosecuted