[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

How about we watch the documentary and see the response to it before leaping to the conclusion that the authorities will do nothing.

A full investigation was launched after Undercover Mosque immediately after it was shown. As it happened, when looked at in the full context of things, they didnt have enough evidence to charge anyone but they did at least look into it.

by your own admission, and affirmation here MTVN - no one needs to jump to conclusions........ see the bit I have highlighted.

This is the UK. The laws of this land dictate that hitting a child is illegal. That means slapping about head, punching legs, kicking legs, grabbing child and slapping them are all illegal acts - all of which were recorded on camera. The Laws of this land are for all those who chose to stay here.

If they want to stay in the UK, they abide by the rules of the UK. If they break those rules, they should be treated exactly the same as non Muslims (ie: the general traditional British public)

What further evidence precisely would you suggest is required for the person responsible to be prosecuted? Wait till some child is punched hard enough that they fall, knocking their head and causing a fatal injury?

Christ, that's like saying, "Yep, we saw the video of the older man raping the child", not enough evidence but hey, we at least looked into it.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

by your own admission, and affirmation here MTVN - no one needs to jump to conclusions........ see the bit I have highlighted.

This is the UK. The laws of this land dictate that hitting a child is illegal. That means slapping about head, punching legs, kicking legs, grabbing child and slapping them are all illegal acts - all of which were recorded on camera. The Laws of this land are for all those who chose to stay here.

If they want to stay in the UK, they abide by the rules of the UK. If they break those rules, they should be treated exactly the same as non Muslims (ie: the general traditional British public)

What further evidence precisely would you suggest is required for the person responsible to be prosecuted? Wait till some child is punched hard enough that they fall, knocking their head and causing a fatal injury?

Christ, that's like saying, "Yep, we saw the video of the older man raping the child", not enough evidence but hey, we at least looked into it.

I'm talking about the Undercover Mosque documentary. As far as I remember that didnt feature content of children being hit, the program focused on the nature of the teaching and preaching at certain mosques. It was investigated immediately - something you are presuming they are not going to do here - but they concluded there wasnt enough evidence to prosecute.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I'm talking about the Undercover Mosque documentary. As far as I remember that didnt feature content of children being hit, the program focused on the nature of the teaching and preaching at certain mosques. It was investigated immediately - something you are presuming they are not going to do here - but they concluded there wasnt enough evidence to prosecute.

It amounts to the same thing as far as I am concerned. The same thing. Practices taking place which if it were by 'British white man', they'd have no hesitation in pulling out all the stops to prosecute.

It's called being pathetically cowardly and allowing the tail to wag the dog.

you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be no action taken against this man - a white man with no previous convictions smacks his daughter for bad behaviour in a dentist, loses his job, and get thrown into jail for 6months.

I bet you don't see so much as a fine, neve mind a jail sentence for this evil old abusing bastard - never mind the hatred he is teaching towards Non Muslims (which given they all are living in a Non Muslim Country, is a bloody cheek).

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

It amounts to the same thing as far as I am concerned. The same thing. Practices taking place which if it were by 'British white man', they'd have no hesitation in pulling out all the stops to prosecute.

It's called being pathetically cowardly and allowing the tail to wag the dog.

you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be no action taken against this man - a white man with no previous convictions smacks his daughter for bad behaviour in a dentist, loses his job, and get thrown into jail for 6months.

I bet you don't see so much as a fine, neve mina a jail sentence for this evil old abusing bastard.

Well what about that documentary on the BNP a few years back? They tried to highlight the extremism of the party, just as Dispatches tried to highlight the extremism of the Mosques. Admittedly Griffin did get taken to court (maybe there was more evidence, I'm not sure) but he was found innocent. You seem to have a bit of a chip on your shoulder here.

You're still jumping to the conclusion that there will be no action taken with no real solid reason to do, other than your own suspicions. What evidence is there to suggest no action will be taken?