Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky.
Yesssss
And my reply was to a part of a post you made about her FACE, not body...
'As for her face - again, it's got to be digitially enhanced beyond all recognition for it to appear in the glossy mags. Anyone had a real look at the state of her skin, the mess her teeth are in - the shots that the paps get.'

|
Oh absolutely agree - many others do have to be digitally enhanced. My point is clear though - bodily, the model is in no shape to be on catwalks - given that some level of reasonable body condition is a pre-requisite. Add to that, my point was that her body isn't in good nick - and neither is her other main area - her face. So effectively - as far a any natural beauty goes: she's losing the race with mother nature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippy
yes, dear.
a word you'd know a LOT about looking at your own comments!
|
I used three words.