Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
ROFL at you.
Criminal offences and cheating are two different things and you know it. If it's not breaking the law and it's a personal issue then I'm all for injunctions, it's not our business to know but past criminal offences are different as it's a matter of public safety. Cheating with a bimbo is hardly comparable to allowing peadophiles to work in schools.
Thanks for making that comparision though, it's made your argument look a whole lot more ridiculous.
|
Erm, I didn't say "convicted" paedophiles .....
Because of your preferred "privacy of the individual", the sexual preferences of employees would be protected information and therefore unknown to prospective employers .....
Of course, I could substute "philanderer" for "paedophile" - persistent philandering is not illegal, of course, but it is highly disruptive in the workplace but, again, under your preferred "privacy of the individual", the sexual proclivity of an employees would be protected information and therefore unknown to the employer until it directly affected the productivity of several individuals .....