[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by vesavius

or 63% are tight miserable bastards.

Or 63% felt spending that amount of money on two people you have known for 8 weeks is excessive... Would you spend £500 on a present for someone you have not known for long??

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

Or 63% felt spending that amount of money on two people you have known for 8 weeks is excessive... Would you spend £500 on a present for someone you have not known for long??

If I was in the house with them, if I liked them and was spending their birthday with them, and if I'd just been given a free £10,000 then I'd consider it

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by MTVN

If I was in the house with them, if I liked them and was spending their birthday with them, and if I'd just been given a free £10,000 then I'd consider it

But if you & two others had agreed not to would you then go back in, behind the third persons back, & buy the presents & not tell said third person?

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

But if you & two others had agreed not to would you then go back in, behind the third persons back, & buy the presents & not tell said third person?

Asking for group loyalty on behalf of Aaron...

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by vesavius

Asking for group loyalty on behalf of Aaron...

So you would or wouldn't do that then?

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

So you would or wouldn't do that then?

Would I try to convince the guy who had stabbed the group in the back previously to spend some of his money when he had already said he didn't want to?

lol no.

He would probably just sulk for 3 days about 'emotional blackmailing' him or something and whine about sticking by his 'principles', or whatever else that would get him camera time. You lose either way with Aaron, walking on eggshells around him trying to not set him off.

I would also assume that he was comfortable with 'screw you jack' game play, as demonstrated by him, and play it accordingly.

Look, Jay and Lou did it for the cameras, just as Aaron has been doing everything for the cameras all season. How come their game playing is condemned and his is celebrated?

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

But if you & two others had agreed not to would you then go back in, behind the third persons back, & buy the presents & not tell said third person?

Nah I wouldn't but Aaron did say that those two could if they wanted and Jay tried to apologise afterwards

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Nah I wouldn't but Aaron did say that those two could if they wanted and Jay tried to apologise afterwards

But they should still have told Aaron that they were, it made it look like they did it deliberatley to make Aaron look bad...

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

But they should still have told Aaron that they were, it made it look like they did it deliberatley to make Aaron look bad...

Yeah they should have to be fair

[soundslike]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

But they should still have told Aaron that they were, it made it look like they did it deliberatley to make Aaron look bad...

Thats what you say. I watched it and it was clear they did it to be nice. At the end of the day BB offered them no other options. And the money is not theirs and I would have played along with it just for the controversy and to see Tom and Alex faces when they received the present.

Aaron is a tight fisted greedy get. Look at the way he jumped up the minute BB mentioned spending the money he didn't wait for any other options he was rushing to leave the DR. I am not suprised they didn't mention it to him again.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by soundslike

[/B]


Thats what you say. I watched it and it was clear they did it to be nice. At the end of the day BB offered them no other options. And the money is not theirs and I would have played along with it just for the controversy and to see Tom and Alex faces when they received the present.

Aaron is a tight fisted greedy get. Look at the way he jumped up the minute BB mentioned spending the money he didn't wait for any other options he was rushing to leave the DR. I am not suprised they didn't mention it to him again.

If they did it to be nice: why then, as soon as Jay and Louise went into the bedroom having bought the gifts: did Louise start bitching about alex, and the fact that Alex wouldn't share things that belonged to Alex, with her (Louise) -.... why then did Louise say, "You don't give to receive.... BUT....." ....which very conveniently WASNT shown on the HLs show.

Because there was nothing genuine in the gesture on Louise's part - and that came over loud and clear.

Jay felt guilty - shown by his rage later on. Shown by him changing the prize money allocation perspex signs...... feeling guilty because he KNOWS he was in the wrong - and Jay never ever admits to him being wrong - he takes it out on everyone else in the only way he knows how - to be aggressive and threatning.