Quote:
Originally Posted by vesavius
Ofc they didn't. Wheres the 'social obligation' that says that a person has to tell another person if they are buying a friend a present? Especially if the first person has said no already, repeatedly.
Aaron stated TWICE prior he didn't want to spend any of his money on Alex/Tom... Why on earth would anyone ask him a third time or include him in their plans... His feelings were clear.
Even if they had told him he probably would have said he felt 'emotionally blackmailed' but was going to 'stick by his principles' or some other victim drivel.
The end result wouldn't have changed. He still would have ruined the birthdays, simply for camera time.
Also, you avoided my question... I asked; The same 'social obligation' that says you should communicate honestly and clearly to the group you have made an agreed plan with before changing your part in that plan?
Why do you insist on 'social obligations' from others but not from Aaron?
|
Both Jay and Louise agreed with him there not to spend any money, they should have told him when they decided to spend their money to avoid him feeling guilty or embarresed when they appeared with expensive gifts and he had nothing.
The example I gave aboves sums up what I meant very clearly.
As for what would have happend next, neither of us are mindreaders, so who knows?
I avoided your other question as;
A. I dont know what you are reffering too.
B. Even if I did I have a feeling it hasnt got much to do with our discussion.
I look foward to your reply, but I can't respond till tommorow, nighty night.
Hybrid Mode
