Quote:
Originally Posted by SoBig
I like Richard, but I completely disagree. On his season, he was the only one that was playing the game. No one back then even wanted to be part of an alliance. So he ends up looking better than he really was. What did he do that was so impressive, walk around naked and catch fish?
|
People who watched Survivor while it originally aired know how big of a deal the alliance debate what. It was seriously unheard of at the time and people thought it ruined the morality of the game. However, it was brilliant at the time and that's what people don't realize.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoBig
Pavarotti
Russell Hantz
Boston Rob
Robb C.
Cirie
Todd
Brian
Tom
Earl
Yul
are all better players and the list is even longer than that.
|
False. Brian's the only one on that list who was better than Hatch. Parvati's extremely overrated, Russell's awful and deluded people like yourself fail to see it, Yul's highly overrated too. And the others are good, but not as good as Richard was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoBig
Russell is the better player and its not even close, but Hatch is the bigger legend because he was the first winner.
|





Seriously if you think Russell is a better player than Richard and that it's "not even close" you really have no clue how Survivor works. Russell's mediocre at best, he doesn't deserve any praise.