[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I understand that (I'm sure you'll say I won't, but hopefully you understand what I mean) and I don't take it as an insult, but my point is - no matter how pissed off you may feel, and no matter how much you may think it concerns you, it does not. It's the duty of the relevant authorities, not regular folk who think they can step in and act as security.



You're making no sense. And you've also avoided the part where I responded to your assumptions that I would in future complain about the lack of train services, why is that?

I am annoyed because you made an assumption about a group of people that included me, even though I clearly stated in numerous posts in this thread that I didn't agree with fare dodging. You saw that, yet continued to make an assumption which implied that I had no problem with it. Now that is what I have a problem with - you making assumptions when I had already stated differently loud and clear several times. It's beyond irritating.

I disagree with you. Be annoyed all you want. That's your right.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Shaun

Surely that'd technically get classed as assault?

Hopefully, because it is a form of one.

Originally Posted by Snowball

I disagree with you.

Elaborate. Because making assumptions about someone when they've already clearly stated an opinion that would immediately disprove those assumptions is extremely rude.