[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lostalex

so all of my responses were deleted, and Pyramid get's the last word? doesn't seem fair to me. i totally pwned him, and yu deleted it all, and made it seem like i had nothing to respond with.

If you look you will see that another 2 posters have posted since the last post of mine - so how that's me having the last word, god knows. I am a 'she' not a 'he'.



You made reference to 'if you want to know about history, go speak to the Scots'.

You are speaking to a Scot, therefore it would appear that since you feel the Scots have more to say on the matter, it would therefore appear that given that I am Scottish, that you would agree with my Scottish points of view.

Why does what happen in the UK as far as our Monarchy concern you so deeply?

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Why does what happen in the UK as far as our Monarchy concern you so deeply?

Ohhh, i'm sorry, i didn't realize this was a British only section of the bus. Sorry, maybe you can tell me which water fountains are for Brits and which are for every one else. i didn't realize this forum was segregated.

My bad, i thought everyone was free to participate in any discussion despite their nationality.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Ohhh, i'm sorry, i didn't realize this was a British only section of the bus. Sorry, maybe you can tell me which water fountains are for Brits and which are for every one else. i didn't realize this forum was segregated.

My bad, i thought everyone was free to participate in any discussion despite their nationality.

I did not suggest it was segregated or not open so no need for such sarcasm. What about the other part of my comment that related to you saying, 'talk to the Scots'. I am one.

I asked why you are so deeply concerned about the UK and it's monarchy. Given that this is very much the topic of the thread, it is a valid question given your opposition to it - I'm wondering why you feel so deeply about it when it doesn't have a direct impact on you. That is not me saying you have no right to discuss it, that's me simply wondering why you have such an interest and opposing view on something that has no effect on you personally in any way.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I did not suggest it was segregated or not open so no need for such sarcasm. What about the other part of my comment that related to you saying, 'talk to the Scots'. I am one.

I asked why you are so deeply concerned about the UK and it's monarchy. Given that this is very much the topic of the thread, it is a valid question given your opposition to it - I'm wondering why you feel so deeply about it when it doesn't have a direct impact on you. That is not me saying you have no right to discuss it, that's me simply wondering why you have such an interest and opposing view on something that has no effect on you personally in any way.

I was obviously saying it as a generalization. I'm sure some Scots are anglophiles, just as some Americans are anglophiles.

Obviously what i was talking about doesn't apply to you, don't take everything i say so personally, geesh, this is why MTVN had to censor our convo, because you take everything to personally,
obviously we are talking in generalizations.

You think everything is a compettion we're talking about history, ity's not a personal attack on you, sorry if you felt personally attacked, i didn't mean anything i said to be a personal attack on you.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Ohhh, i'm sorry, i didn't realize this was a British only section of the bus. Sorry, maybe you can tell me which water fountains are for Brits and which are for every one else. i didn't realize this forum was segregated.

AFAIK, there has never been "segregation" in the UK, unlike the USA, where it persisted until 1968 .....

[Shasown]

Seems to me, our American offspring are jealous of our history and traditions, is all.

Pointing out what they see as irregularities in our state and constitution whilst totally ignoring the blatantly obvious ones in their own.


Is the word "titular" not in the abbreviated dictionary they are taught from?

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Seems to me, our American offspring are jealous of our history and traditions, is all.

Pointing out what they see as irregularities in our state and constitution whilst totally ignoring the blatantly obvious ones in their own.


Is the word "titular" not in the abbreviated dictionary they are taught from?

Yeah this.

[Liberty4eva]

Originally Posted by Shasown

Seems to me, our American offspring are jealous of our history and traditions, is all.

Pointing out what they see as irregularities in our state and constitution whilst totally ignoring the blatantly obvious ones in their own.

Is the word "titular" not in the abbreviated dictionary they are taught from?

The consensus among most historians and political experts is the US Constitution was and still is the best blueprint for government that man has ever put to paper.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Liberty4eva

The consensus among most historians and political experts is the US Constitution was and still is the best blueprint for government that man has ever put to paper.

OTOH, the consensus among most historians and political experts is the US Constitution was and still is the worst blueprint for government that man has ever put to paper, since it has, as its main aim, the eradication, control or corruption of the rest of the world.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Omah

OTOH, the consensus among most historians and political experts is the US Constitution was and still is the worst blueprint for government that man has ever put to paper, since it has, as its main aim, the eradication, control or corruption of the rest of the world.

Yes, you only have to look what's happening to the world now.