Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-03-2012, 10:19 AM #1
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Default

I think the main idea behind the increase in the cost of cigarettes is a good thing, people should cut down because it is unhealthy for them. Thats proven. I know it's an addiction and upping the price will make a lot of people either spend more than they usually do or force them to quit.

They should quit. For their own health

Last edited by Marc; 22-03-2012 at 10:19 AM.
Marc is offline  
Old 22-03-2012, 10:26 AM #2
The Human Santapede's Avatar
The Human Santapede The Human Santapede is offline
Benjamin | I Love Niamh’s Brick
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 71,569

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
The Traitors: Nick Mohammed


The Human Santapede The Human Santapede is offline
Benjamin | I Love Niamh’s Brick
The Human Santapede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 71,569

Favourites (more):
BB2025: Teja
The Traitors: Nick Mohammed


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc View Post
I think the main idea behind the increase in the cost of cigarettes is a good thing, people should cut down because it is unhealthy for them. Thats proven. I know it's an addiction and upping the price will make a lot of people either spend more than they usually do or force them to quit.

They should quit. For their own health
Indeed, I don't even know why I smoke tbh. It's more habit than enjoyment.

On the child allowance subject (I am not very knowledgeable with that area) but somebody I was speaking too was annoyed that their child benefits would be cut, despite them earning over the 60k barrier. I agree it should be cut. They earn enough and why should they be given money because they decided to have children? They don't need it. It's like me, I'm entitled to working tax credits, but I don't take it as I don't need the money as I earn enough through my own merit. I see a lot of people in our country who expect money for nothing but are not prepared to work hard for it.
__________________

It's never too late to be who you once could have been...

Spoiler:



Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN

Anyway there's an explanation and I don't really appreciate your tone. It's very aggressive so I'm going to close this, sorry for killing the internet mate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo View Post
Here iv made a wee paper plane


Older than Niamh

Last edited by The Human Santapede; 22-03-2012 at 10:45 AM.
The Human Santapede is offline  
Old 22-03-2012, 10:38 AM #3
Jesus.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jesus.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's a typical Torie budget, strip money from the services that affect the poorest in society, but ease the burden on the top bracket.

It's a classic Reagan-esque trickle down economic budget plan. By easing the burden on the top, they make a giant assumption that all these people are in the business of job creation, and by doing so, the only thing preventing the rich from creating jobs is an unfair taxation.

This has been proved numerous times to be false. Entrepreneurs don't work like this. I have my own business, and I've taken a 50% cut in my current income, in order that I can take on 2 staff members. I've taken a short term hit to my salary, because I know in 2/3 years time, they would have paid for themselves, and I'll then me earning around 60% more (based on basic targets).

Everywhere in the country we are asking people to sacrifice, yet this government don't believe that businesses should take a short term hit. How can we take food off the poorest tables, but insist that the top can keep the most expensive caviar?

Last edited by Jesus.; 22-03-2012 at 10:38 AM.
 
Old 22-03-2012, 03:56 PM #4
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ukturtle View Post
Indeed, I don't even know why I smoke tbh. It's more habit than enjoyment.

On the child allowance subject (I am not very knowledgeable with that area) but somebody I was speaking too was annoyed that their child benefits would be cut, despite them earning over the 60k barrier. I agree it should be cut. They earn enough and why should they be given money because they decided to have children? They don't need it. It's like me, I'm entitled to working tax credits, but I don't take it as I don't need the money as I earn enough through my own merit. I see a lot of people in our country who expect money for nothing but are not prepared to work hard for it.
Totally agree with child care tax, 60k is a ridiculous amount of money to be earning
Marc is offline  
Old 22-03-2012, 04:04 PM #5
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc View Post
Totally agree with child care tax, 60k is a ridiculous amount of money to be earning
Its referring to child benefit the government capped it at £42'000ish
anyone earning over that did not qualify. Now i think its been raised to £50'000 1% reduction for every £100 above that amount. With a full cap at £60'000
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 22-03-2012, 04:06 PM #6
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Marc Marc is offline
Senior Member
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 81,305

Favourites:
BBUSA17: John


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kizzy View Post
Its referring to child benefit the government capped it at £42'000ish
anyone earning over that did not qualify. Now i think its been raised to £50'000 1% reduction for every £100 above that amount. With a full cap at £60'000
Yeah I got that, I think earning £60,000 is a lot! I think if you have 60k then you'd be able to pay for stuff that your child needs.
Marc is offline  
Old 22-03-2012, 04:32 PM #7
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc View Post
Yeah I got that, I think earning £60,000 is a lot! I think if you have 60k then you'd be able to pay for stuff that your child needs.
You would think so eh mark?
And the cut in the 50p rate is just an apeasement measure for all the high earners with 'creative accountants' who evade paying tax.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
37p, 6pm, budget, fags, uk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts