[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I still don't like the idea of a blanket ban which assumes that someone under the age of 16 who's out after 9 must be causing trouble, it's all quite patronising really. They should be doing more work to try and prevent the genuine troublemakers, instead of bringing in sweeping legislation which punishes the innocent just as much as it does the guilty



They're 15 not 5, you were tucked up in bed by 9 every night at that age?

You have helped me make my mind up on this one,I thought it sounded a good idea but from being 13,I was regularly not in by 9pm, as you say going to the Cinema with friends even just going home after visiting friends too.

I wouldn't have liked to 'have' to be in the house by 9pm, my Parents always knew where I was and trusted me so had this occurred then, why should I have had to conform to a blanket curfew on under 16s.

I am with you on this one, I am against it.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

You have helped me make my mind up on this one,I thought it sounded a good idea but from being 13,I was regularly not in by 9pm, as you say going to the Cinema with friends even just going home after visiting friends too.

I wouldn't have liked to 'have' to be in the house by 9pm, my Parents always knew where I was and trusted me so had this occurred then, why should I have had to conform to a blanket curfew on under 16s.

I am with you on this one, I am against it.

We need to Review it after the 6months test
Give It a Chance