[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Madmacs

...apart from claiming anyone who disagrees with your point of view about Danica, must be either 'someone that 'does the same thing'? or 'those that hate men' ~ you make a valid point. It's a fact of life that good looks can be a benefit to both sexes, although in the sex industry it isn't always about the most beautiful people getting it on for the viewing millions...porn IS degrading because it is about power and not love... but it is the most viewed subject on the www...so a lot of people must like it right? My argument would be that if 2 consenting adults (or as many adults as you like), who are not harming anyone else, and who want to make an exchange for sex over the internet, it really isn't anyone else's business...using words like 'skank' and '*****' are really a reflection of the person saying them and in effect weaken the points trying to be made IMO.

So what words would you use for different peoples trades. Should we call murders human cleansers. Rapists maybe could be called missunderstood and teased lovers. Should we call slags and *****s providers of erotic services and maybe even we should re name womanisers testosterone charge men with sinical views on procreation.

Your argument and views are biased and driven by something nobody on here can figure out. There are stations in life and not every job, trade, living or action can be given the same credability. In my very clear world devoid of rose tinted glasses, you cant possibly give the same credability to a ***** as you do to say a soldier or charity worker or nurse. It just doesent work. These people get up and do a hard days work for pittance wages. Your queen switches on a camera, flaunts herself and cons old sad men into parting with their cash. I see it as a weak form of fraud because they are promising dreams that cant be fullfilled and its praying on the weak.

If anyone out there was to take money from a blind mans hat or overcharged a mentally ill person they would be crucified, but when a ***** rips of an old and probably troubled man for his money, she is a celebrity. Your arguments suck, why cant you accept the plain fact that she is a ***** and the word ***** is only a word delivered to catagorise a type of person. What we percieve that word to mean is up to us.