[jet]

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

[Silent Scream]

Originally Posted by jet

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

When are people going to learn that nom reasons count for absolutely nothing? They nominate people they don't like, it's as simple as that. The 'reasons' don't mean anything. Martin was after Julie before she cheated at noms but was afraid to nom her because he thought she was too popular and it would make him look bad. When he heard the crowd chanting 'get Julie out' he knew it was safe to nom her.

The boys nommed Julie because Martin told them to. Read as much into their reasons as you like but they are incredibly thick and will follow the leader.

You keep ignoring the fact that everyone has seen Julie going round the house playing one person off against the next, telling everyone she loves them then stabbing them in the back, that's the REAL reason she's up.

If you're still on the weak nomination kick take a look at Julie's nom for The Situation. She kissed him on the way in, then stabbed him in the back and kissed him on the way out. 'He's sad, he's missing Danica' LOL. He's had more fun than at any other time in the house since that stupid tart got evicted. He's even getting on with Lorenzo.

If they held an impromptu Weak Nomination Competition Julie would win it hands down. She loves him though, right?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Silent Scream

When are people going to learn that nom reasons count for absolutely nothing? They nominate people they don't like, it's as simple as that. The 'reasons' don't mean anything. Martin was after Julie before she cheated at noms but was afraid to nom her because he thought she was too popular and it would make him look bad. When he heard the crowd chanting 'get Julie out' he knew it was safe to nom her.

The boys nommed Julie because Martin told them to. Read as much into their reasons as you like but they are incredibly thick and will follow the leader.

You keep ignoring the fact that everyone has seen Julie going round the house playing one person off against the next, telling everyone she loves them then stabbing them in the back, that's the REAL reason she's up.

If you're still on the weak nomination kick take a look at Julie's nom for The Situation. She kissed him on the way in, then stabbed him in the back and kissed him on the way out. 'He's sad, he's missing Danica' LOL. He's had more fun than at any other time in the house since that stupid tart got evicted. He's even getting on with Lorenzo.

If they held an impromptu Weak Nomination Competition Julie would win it hands down. She loves him though, right?

You are correct that nom reasons count for nothing (a lot of the time, not always) but you are missing my point, which is how HYPOCRITICAL these people are. A lot can be learned about the HM's by their nominations and the reasons they give - and the reasons given by Martin, Coleen, Prince and the boys show their total hypocrisy and cowardice.
Not one of them has had the guts to talk to Julie about how they felt. They let her carry on doing what they didn't like and talked about her behind her back.

If one or more of them had talked to her about her behaviour she might have thought about it and took it on board - she seems like that sort of person. But they let her think they all still adored her, continuing to be pleasant to her face or like the boys, calling her 'Nan'. Julie may well have thought they enjoyed her banter and little bitchy remarks. Which is probably why she was shocked to be up for nomination.

They are all worse than she is when it comes to being two faced and game playing!

PS MARTIN would win the weakest competition nomination - every one he has made shows just how much of a coward he is.

[Silent Scream]

Originally Posted by jet

You are correct that nom reasons count for nothing (a lot of the time, not always) but you are missing my point, which is how HYPOCRITICAL these people are. A lot can be learned about the HM's by their nominations and the reasons they give - and the reasons given by Martin, Coleen, Prince and the boys show their total hypocrisy and cowardice.
Not one of them has had the guts to talk to Julie about how they felt. They let her carry on doing what they didn't like and talked about her behind her back.

If one or more of them had talked to her about her behaviour she might have thought about it and took it on board - she seems like that sort of person. But they let her think they all still adored her, continuing to be pleasant to her face or like the boys, calling her 'Nan'. Julie may well have thought they enjoyed her banter and little bitchy remarks. Which is probably why she was shocked to be up for nomination.

They are all worse than she is when it comes to being two faced and game playing!

PS MARTIN would win the weakest competition nomination - especially the face to face ones, which showed just how much of a coward he is.

Can you please point out where Julie explained to Colleen why she has such a big problem with her? I must have missed it that particular face to face confrontation. Julie has not been honest with anyone about her nominations she has confronted nobody face to face.

She wanted Lorenzo out then went grovelling to him when she was caught in the act trying to influence noms. She went round EVERYONE before noms trying to get them to like her, it didn't work. She does exactly what you say all the others do.

Just accept it, people will nominate who they like. They are not under any obligation to confront people they nominate or explain anything to them at all. Getting outed as a two-faced bitch will get you up for eviction pronto, it doesn't matter a **** what the nomination reasons are.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Silent Scream

Can you please point out where Julie explained to Colleen why she has such a big problem with her? I must have missed it that particular face to face confrontation. Julie has not been honest with anyone about her nominations she has confronted nobody face to face.

She wanted Lorenzo out then went grovelling to him when she was caught in the act trying to influence noms. She went round EVERYONE before noms trying to get them to like her, it didn't work. She does exactly what you say all the others do.

Just accept it, people will nominate who they like. They are not under any obligation to confront people they nominate or explain anything to them at all. Getting outed as a two-faced bitch will get you up for eviction pronto, it doesn't matter a **** what the nomination reasons are.

Julie hasn't spent the entire series yabbering on about why Coleen doesn't like her,or anyone else for that matter. Maybe you missed the fact that Coleen said she WAS going to confront her and that she talks obsessively about her - and nominated her. It is Coleen who has the big problem with Julie - and talks to everyone but Julie about it - not the other way around!
Julie had not confronted anybody because she hadn't a big enough problem with anybody.
...and when a group turn on a HM en masse and nominate them for something the person hasn't even been aware they were all bothered about - that is horrible and uncomfortable viewing.

[Silent Scream]

Originally Posted by jet

Julie hasn't spent the entire series yabbering on about why Coleen doesn't like her,or anyone else for that matter. Maybe you missed the fact that Coleen said she WAS going to confront her and that she talks obsessively about her - and nominated her. It is Coleen who has the big problem with Julie - and talks to everyone but Julie about it - not the other way around!
Julie had not confronted anybody because she hadn't a big enough problem with anybody.

Have you been watching the show? Julie didn't have a problem with anybody including Colleen? Really?

I suppose like the rest of us you got completely confused with her telling them all she loves them one minute and then spitting on them as soon as they're at a safe distance.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Silent Scream

Have you been watching the show? Julie didn't have a problem with anybody including Colleen? Really?

I suppose like the rest of us you got completely confused with her telling them all she loves them one minute and then spitting on them as soon as they're at a safe distance.

Have you actually read what I posted? I said she didn't have a BIG enough problem with them that she felt the need to talk about people behind their backs over and over to anyone who would listen. Unlike Colleen, who does just that about Julie. The other HM's are also ganging up on Julie and talking about her behind her back and have a big problem with her as many nominated her.
GET IT? GOT IT? GOOD!

[the truth]

Originally Posted by jet

Julie hasn't spent the entire series yabbering on about why Coleen doesn't like her,or anyone else for that matter. Maybe you missed the fact that Coleen said she WAS going to confront her and that she talks obsessively about her - and nominated her. It is Coleen who has the big problem with Julie - and talks to everyone but Julie about it - not the other way around!
Julie had not confronted anybody because she hadn't a big enough problem with anybody.
...and when a group turn on a HM en masse and nominate them for something the person hasn't even been aware they were all bothered about - that is horrible and uncomfortable viewing.

spot on I agree with you
julie is a complex character, absolutely hilarious, yes she is crude and she doesn contradict herself, but she is what she is, she goes for it and entertains everyone. she has also told people soe things to their face too. colleen is the most boring hm in history. julie has her faults but guess wht, shes human like us all!

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by jet

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

Spot on Jet! I'm amazed that more people can not see this!

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by jet

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

h

I agree with you Jet, They are very hypocritical, Julian and the Prince are the only two left in there with any credibility after the latest round of nominations.

[Suze]

Originally Posted by jet

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

Yet another of your posts spot on about the hypocrisy of some in that house You get it, you've got it, good

[jet]

Originally Posted by Suze

Yet another of your posts spot on about the hypocrisy of some in that house You get it, you've got it, good

Thanks! The hypocrisy continues and is really off the scale. It really got me when Coleen said Julie was following her about saying 'we girls should stick together'. As if that was some sort of crime. After all the 3 boys have been talking about sticking together for ages - but that's okay. They have gotten rid of most of the females in the house by 'sticking together'.
But there is no female partisanship with Coleen - she nominates Julie anyway because she wants to be the last girl standing. I wonder how she feels now that she knows Julie was true to what she was saying and didn't nominate her!