[Suze]

Originally Posted by jet

I'm glad that so many of you agree with my post. Thank you!

The hypocrisy of these people continue - Martin nominated Julie because she talked to Harvey about noms. He said it was cheating and she deserved to go for that. Yet Mike was caught cheating during face to face noms and he didn't say a word about it or nominate him.
Same with the boys - their nominations for Julie was because they said she was trying to influence noms, yet they did the same thing to get the girls out - and they too didn't even blink or care when Mike was caught cheating to avoid being put up.

I think it's disgusting the way they are turning on Julie en masse - and talking about her behind her back - the very thing they accuse Julie of doing. Coleen just loves it all and never stops putting her oar in but has never once had the guts to say anything to Julie's face - in the guise of 'I just couldn't upset her'. She's an out and out coward who has got into the final on Julie's coat tails. Without Julie, what storyline would she have brought to the show? ZILCH.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

Yet another of your posts spot on about the hypocrisy of some in that house You get it, you've got it, good

[jet]

Originally Posted by Suze

Yet another of your posts spot on about the hypocrisy of some in that house You get it, you've got it, good

Thanks! The hypocrisy continues and is really off the scale. It really got me when Coleen said Julie was following her about saying 'we girls should stick together'. As if that was some sort of crime. After all the 3 boys have been talking about sticking together for ages - but that's okay. They have gotten rid of most of the females in the house by 'sticking together'.
But there is no female partisanship with Coleen - she nominates Julie anyway because she wants to be the last girl standing. I wonder how she feels now that she knows Julie was true to what she was saying and didn't nominate her!