[Urban Cragou]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Not up in Scotland it's not... it's positively necessary !!

sorry...

I dont think there is anything unatural at all for a person/people to want to nurture, care, love and want to raise a human being - I'd far rather gay parents who were able to do that than some of the examples of 'hetro' parents - stories of which we are all too familiar with.

Don't get me wrong, gay people are more than free to adopt and I support that notion, but imo having children biologically should be between a man and a woman.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Redway

Don't get me wrong, gay people are more than free to adopt and I support that notion, but imo having children biologically should be between a man and a woman.

What about women (or men) in a hetro relationship, who cannot conceive naturally - are you against nature being given a helping hand? It still requires the cells from both a man and a woman........

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Redway

Don't get me wrong, gay people are more than free to adopt and I support that notion, but imo having children biologically should be between a man and a woman.

Erm the woman would still be having the baby, you do know that gay men can't have babies right?? Only difference is that 2 men would bring up the baby, rather than a man & a woman...