Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah
What "abuse"?
The 9-year-old who is now 39 tears old alleges that she was "touched" some time between January 1, 1983 and December 31, 1983
If she wants to take it to Crown Court where she will be subject to scrutiny and cross-examination on such apparently flimsy "evidence", that's up to her, but I've sat as a juror on a very similar case and the verdict went against the plaintiff, so I would suggest that either more concrete "evidence" be found or she drop the charge ..... 
If Hall is found "Not Guilty" he may well go after some serious "damages" - can she or her family meet those costs? |
Would it have gone to crown court if there was zero evidence?
Threaded Mode