|
oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
We all like the nice housemates, we all like nice people. But it's counter-intuitive to support them in an entertainment-based television programme. It's illogical. This isn't a tea party with your friends, you aren't living with them. If the house was full of these 'nice' people, nobody would watch because it isn't interesting. The cast this year is very poor, and Speidi (and Paula was) is holding it up. Without them it'd be one big harmonious happy ****ing family every highlight show and there'd be nothing to discuss, and in a show which thrives on discussion and debate, that's not very good.
If there's nothing to discuss at work, school, on forums, on spin-off shows, nobody cares, so nobody watches. Nice people do not generate discussions. Arguments, feuds, game playing, nasty, rude (whatever you want to call them) people do. No one's advocating their behaviour but this is TV, it isn't real. We're not electing somebody, we're crowning them the winner of an entertainment programme. It's no surprise viewing figures started to fall when Jasmine left CBB10, and there's many other similar cases in previous series. Controversial housemates carry the show, and it is illogical to want them out and to support those who do not contribute anything. If anything you're just wanting the show to fall flat on its face, and that's not very fan-like if you ask me.
|