Originally Posted by Jack_

Oh actually I forgot to add something which may partly solve this problem.

- Hold at least two (excluding the vote to win) evictions where the whole house is up regardless in a bid to cull the dull. Possibly make them doubles.

But Jay had that sorted. He was always trying to incorporate people into his gang, and if you knew you were on the chopping block, you'd replace one of the outgoing people.

After a couple of years, people may realise they needed alliances, but I'd have no interest in an American BB over here. BB isn't a team sport. You should never win the game because you join the right gang on the first night.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Jesus.H.Christ

But Jay had that sorted. He was always trying to incorporate people into his gang, and if you knew you were on the chopping block, you'd replace one of the outgoing people.

After a couple of years, people may realise they needed alliances, but I'd have no interest in an American BB over here. BB isn't a team sport. You should never win the game because you join the right gang on the first night.

But ultimately if you had two occasions where the whole house were up and four people in total left then that's more than enough opportunity for the public to get rid of who they want, surely? Of course under normal noms it may be the same people up each time and so a gang like Jay's would get their way but there'd still be no escaping the whole house being up, so at some point their reign would at least be threatened.

Alternatively they should chop and change when the housemates can talk about noms. I had no problem with them stopping it last year (well, I did), but I'd have had less of a problem had they brought it back a few weeks later. That'd perhaps work better, because it's great to watch, and then they could stop it for a couple of weeks to try and stop block voting, and then restart it again to see new plotting develop.

Originally Posted by Jack_

But ultimately if you had two occasions where the whole house were up and four people in total left then that's more than enough opportunity for the public to get rid of who they want, surely? Of course under normal noms it may be the same people up each time and so a gang like Jay's would get their way but there'd still be no escaping the whole house being up, so at some point their reign would at least be threatened.

Alternatively they should chop and change when the housemates can talk about noms. I had no problem with them stopping it last year (well, I did), but I'd have had less of a problem had they brought it back a few weeks later. That'd perhaps work better, because it's great to watch, and then they could stop it for a couple of weeks to try and stop block voting, and then restart it again to see new plotting develop.

I think a couple of weeks throughout the duration of the show might work. If that happened though, I'd like them to say weeks 3 and 10 on the first show, so we'd have some feeling they weren't just ****ing around with things to get results they wanted.

That crypt bollocks came out of nowhere to protect Jay and Anton, and these twists need to be announced before nominations. The twists should be for the hm's, not for us. I don't vote anymore, but I don't want my credulity stretched.