[the truth]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

He was a controlling man, he had worked in the past and had even been in the army. Makes you wonder what he must have been like in the army.

The Judge who had heard all the evidence oddly enough didn't have some obsession as to the benefeits he as getting.
He was seen as someone who saw the people in his life and his children too as possessions, to be controlled and for him never to be crossed.
That was his Mental/psychological issues clearly,being very generous to him as to that though.

What had triggered him to this, was the fact the other woman had left and taken her 5 children with her, he hated losing what he saw as those possessions, working or on benefits he would have likely done the same thing in order to get back at her.

Yes there is the income issue, as she would have likely been taking away the paying in of her benefits and wages too into his account.
Money and people as possessions were the main issues here but even had he been working full time, if the women had been working full time and one had dared to leave him in all likelihood he would have reacted the same.

He wanted 'his' posessions around him, to control them and make sure he had control of them too.
That is the rottenness of his thinking and personality,it is also why this likely happened not because of being on benefits.

It is also not really appropriate in my view anyway, to state this is becasue of the benefits culture anyway, others with large families, as has been said on here, don't act this way and certainly I would guess way into the top half of the 90+% of people on benefits would act this way either.

The man's mind was corrupt with really closed thinking,benefits didn't do that, it was how he was.

absolute rubbish

the fact is the benefits system and the lazy benefits culture encouraged such a man to be a lazy scumbag, to waste his life boozing , impregnating women endlessly and chasing other women. all paid for by the taxes of the hard working men. it gave him everything for free, it made him a minor celebrity too. his ego was out of control and he even used his disgusting past as an excuse to avoid work and society rewarded him? our system is corrupt. all his benefits should have been taken. there are always jobs out there. the man had no disabilities so he should have had no benefits , go to work or starve. the social services failed totally. he was clearly a disaster waiting to happen. the benefits system and the benefits culture has institutionalised this mans disgusting lifestyle and Im glad osborne questioned it.