Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway
Absolute nonsense.
It is not acceptable to invade a 17-year-old's privacy and publish tweets and pictures of her without permission. It's essentially bullying and whilst what she said was wrong, what full rights to the Daily Mail have to post them all across the nation? I believe she was between 14 and 16 when she made those posts anyway, and I think it's reasonable that she wouldn't go rummaging through her her status history, some of which started three years ago.
I'd go on all day but Jack's done a fine job of expanding on what I was going to say. I refer you to the rest of them.
|
If you are associated with public services your online conduct is open to scrutiny.. It's a sad fact, if you are 17 or 67 that is the case.
Threaded Mode