[the truth]

Originally Posted by Ben

He was sexist. Even on You're hired he failed to properly explain why he took those two in to the boardroom over the two in his team that actually messed up and cost him the win, and said it was just coincidence that it looked like sexism. He ignored Natalie and her input, he riled up Leah and didn;t even have the common courtesy to hold the door for Natalie on return to the boardroom.

youre wrong and if you made such a nonsense accusation in the real world you would be rightly sued the pants off
he perfectly justified it and did so politely too....he said leah was negative from the start offered no support, demanded she be leader then after a democratic vote to have zee as leader she demanded she lead the sub team with no discussion or asking others....zee rightly said he gave her this chance showing he wasn't in any way sexism or biased......she failed , she ignored him from the start slagged him off every single second and in the end she contributed almost nothing and came back with just 1 product a deal she herself did not clinch

meanwhile Natalie has been on the losing team every week (possible 1 off) each week shes done almost nothing of note, she only ever pipes up in the boardroom, she contributed nothing, no products , no ideas and she simply played to the cameras for pity.....lets face it the team were a disaster but leah dragged it down more than anyone and Natalie simply did nothing.....at least the other 2 showed energy and purpose and positive efforts.