[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Ellen

Dan interfered in a discussion(at the time it was not an argument) with Jemima & Charlie, Dan made it into an argument. He stated when talking to Hazel he will say something when he doesnt agree with something. On that, what is the difference of Joe saying something when he didnt like what Dan was saying?

Well with respect you have just defeated your own argument because you are hammering Dan for intervening in other discussions but now when Joe does it you side with him.
Both must be worng logically if Dan is generally all the time.

edit; Misread your quote, my apologies, you are saying they would both be wrong in that instance. Sincerest apologies Ellen.