[elliebrew]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well from my own angle and I do see your point Salman completely,I also agree that Dan could be saved over Wolfy or maybe even Gina.
I cannot guess who the housemates may choose so I accept all that.

However, I prefer having the housemates nominate, BB decides sets the rules as to whether its a min 2 or min 3 housemates up for eviction and then we the public take over and evict one of however many are up that week.

I hate manipulation in any way.
I hate the nomination process being meddled with but I hate even more the meddling with the eviction procedure too, especially after the housemates have nominated and BB have already declared who would be up for eviction as they did last night.

Even more to my dislike is the freezing of the lines ona wednesday and this further rumoured twist makes that all the more distasteful.
The ask the housemates to nominate face to face as to who they wnat out, then they ask the same housemates to change their minds and save one, not even giving the public a say.

That is what to me, is wrong with this twist,no matter who is saved.
I don't hate Wolfy, or Dexter, Gina and certainly not Dan but I would be saying all this still even if Dan was the one to get saved by this twist.

Just why can they not leave nominations and evictions alone.
If they are going to alter the nominations made by this twist and a housemate is then taken out of the process with no public voting at all, then why even bother to do nominations in the first place.

It stinks quite frankly,really rotten too and they are ruining a rather good series by such 'engineering' as I call it.

The entire poit of the game is nominations an evictions

ANY an EVERY twist will affect nominations or evictions in some way

It's always been the nature of the game.

I love a twist o proceedings. It breaks up the weeks and allows people who wouldn't ordinarily be in the firing line to be potentially evicted.