[Ramsay]

Was there any need to put the fat part in the title?

[LikeABoatOnWater]

Originally Posted by Karl

Was there any need to put the fat part in the title?

It defines them. There have been quite a few twins on BB over the years and these ones are distinctively fat. Hence why I refer to them as the fat twins.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by LikeABoatOnWater

It defines them. There have been quite a few twins on BB over the years and these ones are distinctively fat. Hence why I refer to them as the fat twins.

[grandefratello]

Originally Posted by LikeABoatOnWater

It defines them. There have been quite a few twins on BB over the years and these ones are distinctively fat. Hence why I refer to them as the fat twins.

I agree with you, and what's wrong with calling them 'fat', which is what they are. You could have been much more uncharitable by using other suitable adjectives such as thick, gormless, irritating, desperate, vacuous, boring etc etc!

Incidentally, I generally refer to them as Tweedeldum and Tweedledumber!

[Jay Frost]

Originally Posted by LikeABoatOnWater

It defines them. There have been quite a few twins on BB over the years and these ones are distinctively fat. Hence why I refer to them as the fat twins.

This. Be quiet Karl. Stop being a Jackie Travers

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Karl

Was there any need to put the fat part in the title?

Yep, comes across as you have a problem with big people by making it a focal point of the thread title. The horrible twins would have done just as well.