[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't.... I believe this child was groomed, and to place the blame at her parents feet is sickening.
Whatever the child thought or felt is irrelevant as it is the law that they are not mentally mature to make rational desisions at this age which is the whole reason for minimum age for minors:..

Nobody has the transcript for the trial and all we have is our personal opinion in reality and we base our reaction to this hoohar on that.
However if the CPS have chosen to investigate then that suggests some wrong doing in his professional capacity as a judge.

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I didn't suggest it was did I?
It was a comparison to similar cases not an assumption.
Neither did I say the child was not the parents responsibility, can you try not to misquote me so often please?
And her parents were not the ones on trial here, I feel this needs to be said..again.
Can't do much as on my phone but will help find you some info when I can.

To be fair Kizzy, you did say you believe she had been groomed so it is based on assumption.