[sampvt]

There is nothing wrong with winning money, its the way you win it that counts.

[Im_Juz_ChiLLin]

Originally Posted by sampvt

There is nothing wrong with winning money, its the way you win it that counts.

Does that count for Sam too, Greedy Sam went on Deal for No Deal for Sympathy money....

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Im_Juz_ChiLLin

Does that count for Sam too, Greedy Sam went on Deal for No Deal for Sympathy money....

I didn't see that episode so I cant comment but I would rather vote for a man with a definatley provable handicap than a scammer who just dreams of chicks, booze and fame. No contest in my book.

[Im_Juz_ChiLLin]

Originally Posted by sampvt

I didn't see that episode so I cant comment but I would rather vote for a man with a definatley provable handicap than a scammer who just dreams of chicks, booze and fame. No contest in my book.

@BOld your describing greedy Sam....

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by sampvt

There is nothing wrong with winning money, its the way you win it that counts.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by sampvt

There is nothing wrong with winning money, its the way you win it that counts.

But BB are the ones who decide how the money is won, you can only work with what they set you and in that instance it looked as though a chunk of the money was going to be leaving the house and right now was the best opportunity to be the one leaving with it

This seems the first year really where it's not considered acceptable to want the money, people might have hated Conor last year but no one really held it against him or thought he was greedy that he (and Luke S) wanted to walk away right at that moment with £50k