[erinp5]

Publican Craig Davies also revealed he had banned Sam after he hit customers with a pool cue and treated staff "like skivvies". Deaf Sam has won over viewers with his Harry Styles looks and cheeky chappy image.

The 23-year-old is the 8-1 bookies' favourite to win on Monday, but Craig said: "He is a horrible, arrogant little sh*t."
Craig, 42 who runs The South Star, Llanelli, Carmarthenshire, spoke out yesterday to plead with viewers not to vote for him.

He said: "I've banned him from my boozer as he's a rude, obnoxious, arrogant little kid and people should know what he is like.

"The Sam they see on Big Brother is a fake."

Local pub landlord Craig banned Sam from his pub football teamLocal pub landlord Craig banned Sam from his pub football team


“I've banned him from my boozer as he's a rude, obnoxious, arrogant little kid and people should know what he is like”
Craig Davies
Craig's pub is near the training ground of Sam's football team West End United, who play in the Carmarthenshire League.

He said Sam was friendly at first until going on Channel 4's Deal Or No Deal early this year.

Craig revealed: "Sam thought because he'd been on TV he was a celebrity. He started being rude and offensive.

"He swore at my staff and treated them like skivvies. He upset customers by whacking them with his pool cue because they got in the way of his shots."

Sam's club apologised and asked him to lift the ban but Craig refused to do so.

He said: "They may have said sorry but Sam didn't. Every time I've seen him on Big Brother looking like butter wouldn't melt, I've thought: 'You're acting!' "It'd be the worst thing in the world if he won.

"His head would get so big it wouldn't fit in the Valleys."

Last night Sam's family declined to comment.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by erinp5

The 23-year-old is the 8-1 bookies' favourite to win on Monday, but Craig said: "He is a horrible, arrogant little sh*t."
Craig, 42 who runs The South Star, Llanelli, Carmarthenshire, spoke out yesterday to plead with viewers not to vote for him.

This story is quite old then? He hasnt been 8/1 for a very long time. I assumed this was a new story.

I find it quite interesting that his family declined to comment..though of course that in no way says the article is true. Its just interesting.

[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

This story is quite old then? He hasnt been 8/1 for a very long time. I assumed this was a new story.

I find it quite interesting that his family declined to comment..though of course that in no way says the article is true. Its just interesting.

Family declining to comment. HHmmm. If someone told tales about my loved one I'd defend the truth and if serious sue. Oh well

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

Family declining to comment. HHmmm. If someone told tales about my loved one I'd defend the truth and if serious sue. Oh well

Defend something written in the Daily Star?

Takes all kinds I suppose!

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

Defend something written in the Daily Star?

Takes all kinds I suppose!

Serious question: do you think Sam will take libel action against the DS when he gets out?

He could get more than the BB prize fund if the DS has printed an untruth.

If you think he won't, you have to ask yourself why not!

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Serious question: do you think Sam will take libel action against the DS when he gets out?

He could get more than the BB prize fund if the DS has printed an untruth.

If you think he won't, you have to ask yourself why not!

Don't know and don't care. Just the same as I don't care about any of the other HM's and what low life journalist from the Daily Star make up.... sorry....write about them after they've left the house.

Maybe he will and maybe he won't because he couldn't be arsed?

But he's not out yet, and by the time he is and BB is all over, everyone will forget anyway.... I'm certainly not going to check up on whether he did or didn't that's up to him. But you can if you want to.

Just want to add - somebody worked out that this was quite an old article. Maybe they have given a comment but because of the situation (eviction/betting) Daily Star have chosen not to include it?

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

maybe he won't because he couldn't be arsed?

LMAO! Couldn't be arsed...... for probably tens of thousands? Oh come on! Sam would just need to get a 'no win - no fee' lawyer and he could be quids in.

What about the publican quoted? Have the DS lied about what he said? If so, he too could take libel action.

Sorry but there is only one conclusion: it may be in the Daily Star but there is no way that rag's lawyers would let an article like this be printed if it wasn't provable.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

This story is quite old then? He hasnt been 8/1 for a very long time. I assumed this was a new story.

I find it quite interesting that his family declined to comment..though of course that in no way says the article is true. Its just interesting.

Was in the Star today, guess they're just a bit out of date or made an error with their odds or something