| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Chat and Games Looking for forum games, and completely off topic banter - this is your place! (includes Virtual Big Brother type forum games) |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#127 | |||
|
||||
|
SIGH
|
Scott's ban needs to be reconsidered
__________________
![]() Calling bigotry an opinion is like calling arsenic a flavour. ………….
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#128 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
I think Scott's ban should only be reconsidered if other people are willing to come forward and face consequences of that burn blog. Seems like a fair trade to me. It's the reason he was put on an indefinite ban because nobody else could be held accountable for it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#129 | |||
|
||||
|
Lee.
|
I can state that by the time I tried to post something it had been taken down!
Mines was just a rant about how disgusting I found some of the comments
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#130 | |||
|
||||
|
Texas Forever
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#131 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#132 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
Of course they won't, but I think it's crap to try and wipe what Scott's blog did clean when he got made into a scape goat for its entire contents and I'd imagine a few of the people being vocal about him returning were involved in some of the bile posted on there. Glenn's freely admitted to posting stuff and Lucas did too, we've since spoken about it and we're cool, but I would imagine there are a lot of people who posted on there that have never admitted to it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#133 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
Well then he should remain banned. If people who were involved are happy for him to be the only one punished, then he should remain the only one punished. We've no way of finding out or proving who was involved unless people admit to it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#135 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
They don't have to admit to what they said, they just have to say "I was responsible for some of the content on that blog." The moderating team can decide what to do after that.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#136 | |||
|
||||
|
Inactive
|
I have no idea who this Scott person is... but from my understanding he was banned for writing a vicious blog about people on here?
Sorry, I'm just trying to follow this thread and it's a bit confusing.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#137 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
I didn't write anything vile I'm not nasty
|
||
|
|
|
|
#138 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#140 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Well as you have said, some have admitted to playing a part and nothing happened (that we are aware of)...so nothing should happen to others...therefore meaning scott still takes the blame? I am in no way condoning the blog, I read it and it was awful but there is some injustice in all of this...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#141 | |||
|
||||
|
SIGH
|
There's members involved that I know for a fact that won't own up.
__________________
![]() Calling bigotry an opinion is like calling arsenic a flavour. ………….
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#143 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
Quote:
Essentially I think TiBB doesn't need the return of someone who thinks it's funny to create a hate blog, send pictures of his genitals via private messages to half the forum or stalk people around the internet writing abuse on things they do that have nothing to do with TiBB. He doesn't take this place at all seriously or the people on it - and every high and mighty person likes to say "it's just the internet, don't take it so seriously" but do you know what? That's not true at all. We're all human beings with emotions and feelings and sometimes they can be hurt, especially on the internet where some people don't seem to think the things they say and do have any impact once they've hit the submit reply button. That's why those people end up being excluded from our community and are left begging to return - and I don't think Scott has ever or will ever learn his lesson. He's been given enough second chances. Enough is enough in my opinion. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#144 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Yes a Sex Side to it all I got one sent to me inbox color photo (so did others) I said mine is Bigger Last edited by arista; 15-12-2013 at 03:28 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#146 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
-I only wrote the one comment about Zee trying to be funny and it wasn't and we have had words and I think he's a great guy and I wasn't trying to be malicious- <3. I do think the burn blog never intended to go that far, but heated things were said and it did get brutual, but yeah Scott isn't only to blame in all of this.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#148 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
I was there when it was created and Scott spoke of it in the chat thread but I went offline before he even turned asks on and missed everything.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
#149 | |||
|
||||
|
All hail the Moyesiah
|
I think people are simplifying the ban too much by reducing it down to this one blog, pass it off as some silly mistake, and therefore make out it was all a big overreaction by Admin/the Mods. I can't add that much to Zee's post earlier in the thread but Scott himself I'm sure would admit that he's always pushed the boundaries the whole time he was on here, it's why he was originally permabanned as pisshead, it's why he got a 3 month ban as simonsays, and why he had numerous other bans and infractions. The blog alone was not what got him a ban, though I also think that now that it's been a few months since it happened people in hindsight are trying to minimise how bad it was. The stuff on there couldn't really have been any worse and is the sort of stuff that would really make you question people, (and as Zee also said) I don't buy that because it's just the internet, or because it was 'just a joke' that that makes it any less worse
It is an indefinite ban not a permaban and it will be considered (pretty much every ban does get considered in the admin section at some point) and possibly lifted at some point, Admin will decide if and when that is with the help of Mods. Not sure what else there is to add to that. Last edited by MTVN; 15-12-2013 at 03:30 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|