[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by sampvt

My parents sent me to UNI and when I was there I learned to decipher English. At no point in your post do you mention Jim or the points you come back at me at. You start and finish all about Luisa. Jims not in it nor anything to do with what he said to her.

I don't mind taking criticism, but in this case I need you to point out the bit in your post that refers to what the hell you are on about. I am not alone here so please clear it up for me and by the way, I am not a psychologist so I can read your mind or thoughts so please don't say....that's not what I meant, or you misunderstood me. The post is above and its pretty clear to me that you were championing Luisa and your latest retort was about something else. I am simply asking for clarification so I can apologise if I am wrong.

My question is simply about your first paragraph. Judge her as a HM when you tell us we cant judge jim and a hm, we need to look as his life instead, simples.

So you mean my first post in this thread then?

If that's the case then yeah ofcourse its all about Luisa, why would I even mention Jim in a thread asking if people have warmed to her.

You said it yourself I didn't mention Jim in that first post, theres no reason to. Just because I said judge her as a housemate doesn't automatically mean you cant do the same for every other housemate.

But you're also saying I only mention Luisa yet say I told you you cant judge Jim as a hm also? So first you say I make no mention of him then you say ive said you can not judge him as a housemate?

Tell me now you're not confused.