Quote:
Originally Posted by troynuncdicit
Nobody's claiming that Jim mentioned her husband by name. However, Jim's intentions were clear and it was entirely calculated. He knows what he was referring to, Linda knows what they were referring to. You're incredibly biased if you're trying to deny that.
How would my point be more valid if Linda ignored someone going below the belt? She stuck up for herself and for her husband and told Jim to **** off in a situation where he crossed many lines and should be told to **** off. If anything that's admirable.
|
She bit. It's what she's been trying to make Jim do all game so far. Better play to pretend to have no idea and make him look a complete fool / force HIM to explain the incident should he care to do so.