Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
Personally I don't think a lot of people on here get that, because she's still being called a homewrecker and a slag. Some may get it, but a lot don't
And personally because of the fact the Rooney incident wasn't her fault in the slightest I don't really see that she doesn't have the grounds to bring up the 'girl code'. What she was saying was wrong and is actually ironically sexist itself - this bizarre assumption that an attractive woman can't share a shower with a man without it meaning something, what kind of ridiculous bull**** - but just because she was paid to do a job that led to a married man being unfaithful to his wife I don't see why she shouldn't be allowed to air that opinion
If people want to criticise her morality, they should bring up her treatment of Jale or selling the story to the papers, not the incident itself
|
I would never call another woman a slag, I despise that word, especially coming from another woman, that's my girl code
The point I'm making here is (and this nothing to do with what I think about prostitution) I just think, if you're in that job, you go into it knowing that probably a large chunk of your clients will be married and will be cheating on their partners, fair enough that's their issue not yours but if in your normal life you're of the opinion that girls should have some sort of a code and not even shower clothed with men who are attached(and I use that term loosely here since Winston barely even knows Tamara) how can you not say it's rich or hypocritical? It's either the attached persons fault or it's not, whether you're being paid or not, do you understand what I'm trying to say? (I'm not trying to be patronizing here, I just don't know If I'm explaining myself very well
)
To me it'd be like a vegetarian preaching about how meat is murder and making people feel bad for eating meat but then working in an abattoir but being excused for that cos you get paid for it
Ash,
Hybrid Mode
