[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

]

“Name calling, persistent ridiculing and behaviour that results in an individual becoming ostracized from the group are all types of behaviour that can be perceived as bullying,” asserted Big Brother.

Read more: http://www.bbspy.co.uk/bb15/news/061...#ixzz36z8GBlvz

See! You can do it. Well done!

"types of behaviour that can be perceived as bullying"


Is not bullying.

You can't go to Court and be convicted because someone perceives you to be a mass murderer.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Verbal

See! You can do it. Well done!

"types of behaviour that can be perceived as bullying"


Is not bullying.

You can't go to Court and be convicted because someone perceives you to be a mass murderer.

Well, physically murdering someone is a more black and white issue I would have thought then deciding what does and does not constitute as bullying, not really comparable Verbal and why on Earth would Big Brother warn someone and use the word bullying if she was doing nothing of the sort?

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Well, physically murdering someone is a more black and white issue I would have thought then deciding what does and does not constitute as bullying, not really comparable Verbal and why on Earth would Big Brother warn someone and use the word bullying if she was doing nothing of the sort?

Because people get butthurt and ring Ofcom, which gets them in trouble. Then they have to be seen as taking action.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Verbal

Because people get butthurt and ring Ofcom, which gets them in trouble. Then they have to be seen as taking action.

I disagree, if they were doing what the people wanted they would have kicked her out or atleast revoked her pass by now. Anyway, we're going round in circles here, you don't think she's a vile bully, I do. The End.

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I disagree, if they were doing what the people wanted they would have kicked her out or atleast revoked her pass by now. Anyway, we're going round in circles here, you don't think she's a vile bully, I do. The End.

That is not true at all, not everyone wants her out. So you do not speak on behalf of 'the people', just a very small section of them.

None of you can debate for toffee, honestly.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Verbal

Because people get butthurt and ring Ofcom, which gets them in trouble. Then they have to be seen as taking action.

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I disagree, if they were doing what the people wanted they would have kicked her out or atleast revoked her pass by now. Anyway, we're going round in circles here, you don't think she's a vile bully, I do. The End.

Originally Posted by Verbal

That is not true at all, not everyone wants her out. So you do not speak on behalf of 'the people', just a very small section of them.

None of you can debate for toffee, honestly.

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

people

the people

There is a difference

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Well, physically murdering someone is a more black and white issue I would have thought then deciding what does and does not constitute as bullying, not really comparable Verbal and why on Earth would Big Brother warn someone and use the word bullying if she was doing nothing of the sort?

Because people were complaining and having a meltdown online that whole weekend that they weren't doing anything and it was starting to get media attention so to quieten people down they gave people what they wanted

If she actually was bullying people they'd say 'Big Brother deems this behaviour to be bullying and is issuing you with a formal warning' (there's no interpretation mentioned whenever they are serious about a warning), the fact they said it could be interpreted as bullying speaks volumes about whether they consider it to be IMO and I think it's basically saying 'a lot of the viewers think it's bullying so we're telling you'

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Because people were complaining and having a meltdown online that whole weekend that they weren't doing anything and it was starting to get media attention so to quieten people down they gave people what they wanted

If she actually was bullying people they'd say 'Big Brother deems this behaviour to be bullying and is issuing you with a formal warning' (there's no interpretation mentioned whenever they are serious about a warning), the fact they said it could be interpreted as bullying speaks volumes about whether they consider it to be IMO and I think it's basically saying 'a lot of the viewers think it's bullying so we're telling you'

Exactly what Jack said.

The end.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Because people were complaining and having a meltdown online that whole weekend that they weren't doing anything and it was starting to get media attention so to quieten people down they gave people what they wanted

If she actually was bullying people they'd say 'Big Brother deems this behaviour to be bullying and is issuing you with a formal warning' (there's no interpretation mentioned whenever they are serious about a warning), the fact they said it could be interpreted as bullying speaks volumes about whether they consider it to be IMO and I think it's basically saying 'a lot of the viewers think it's bullying so we're telling you'

defending the females in the house again jack, even ones as abusive and bullying as jack. if any man behaved like her to a woman, hed have been turfed out by now.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by the truth

defending the females in the house again jack

No, I'm defending

a) entertaining housemates
b) housemates that are accused of being bullies when they aren't

Originally Posted by the truth

even ones as abusive and bullying as jack.

I'm not a bully

Originally Posted by the truth

if any man behaved like her to a woman, hed have been turfed out by now.

And where did I say I disagree with that? I know they would and I know that's sexist double standards, I wouldn't agree with them being removed either